...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interventional cardiology >Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:阀门处的阀门转阀主动脉瓣植入(VIV-TAVI)与重做外科主动脉瓣更换(REDO-SAVR):系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Bioprosthetic (BP) valves have been increasingly used for aortic valve replacement over the last decade. Due to their limited durability, patients presenting with failed BP valves are rising. Valve in Valve - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (ViV-TAVI) emerged as an alternative to the gold standard redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (redo-SAVR). However, the utility of ViV-TAVI is poorly understood.
机译:背景:在过去的十年中,生物瓣膜越来越多地用于主动脉瓣置换术。由于其耐久性有限,出现BP瓣膜故障的患者正在增加。瓣中瓣-经导管主动脉瓣植入术(ViV TAVI)作为金标准redo外科主动脉瓣置换术(redo SAVR)的替代方案出现。然而,人们对ViV TAVI的效用知之甚少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号