首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international management >Country institutional environments and international strategy: A review and analysis of the research
【24h】

Country institutional environments and international strategy: A review and analysis of the research

机译:国家机构环境与国际战略:对研究的审查与分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We review and analyze the growing body of literature that addresses the institutional context of international strategy. By examining articles in eleven major journals from January 2008 to July 2020, we identify six major categories of international strategies and implementation approaches: market entry and internationalization, political strategies, multinational technology and innovation, multinational corporate social responsibility, multinational headquarters and subsidiary relationships, and international human resources management. A parallel analysis of the relevant institutional variables categorizes institutions into eight types: economic institutions, political institutions, regulatory institutions, normative institutions, administrative institutions, cultural/ cognitive institutions, demographic institutions, and knowledge institutions. These eight categories allow us to contextualize the institutional environment in which the six international strategies and implementation approaches are employed. Our review identifies important progress in international strategy research that has yielded a greater understanding of institutional impact on multinational activities. Yet, it also reveals that many areas of international strategy research remain fragmented, highlighting the need for future research and suggesting new directions for such investigations. Our analysis concludes by identifying knowledge gaps in each of the six strategy categories and making a series of suggestions for relevant future research.
机译:我们回顾和分析了越来越多涉及国际战略制度背景的文献。通过审查2008年1月至2020年7月在11种主要期刊上发表的文章,我们确定了六大类国际战略和实施方法:市场进入和国际化、政治战略、跨国技术和创新、跨国公司社会责任、跨国总部和子公司关系,以及国际人力资源管理。对相关制度变量的平行分析将制度分为八类:经济制度、政治制度、监管制度、规范制度、行政制度、文化/认知制度、人口制度和知识制度。这八个类别使我们能够将采用六项国际战略和实施方法的体制环境结合起来。我们的审查确定了国际战略研究的重要进展,这些进展使我们对跨国活动的体制影响有了更深入的了解。然而,它也揭示了国际战略研究的许多领域仍然支离破碎,突出了未来研究的必要性,并为此类研究提出了新的方向。我们的分析最后确定了六个战略类别中每一个类别的知识差距,并为相关的未来研究提出了一系列建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号