...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of infection prevention >Audit of the management of patients at high risk of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE): Are we ready?
【24h】

Audit of the management of patients at high risk of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE): Are we ready?

机译:审核患者的患者患者生产高风险肠道酶的肠杆菌(CPE):我们准备好了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Incidence of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in the UK is increasing. In 2013, Public Health England (PHE) published a toolkit to control spread of CPE within healthcare settings. Aim: To assess compliance to hospital CPE policy (adapted from PHE) in the identification, isolation and screening of suspected CPE patients. Methods: Admission booklets of 150 patients were evaluated to see whether the relevant section had been completed to identify high-risk CPE patients. Where necessary, patients were interviewed or their GPs were contacted to assess their CPE risk. Additionally, 28 patients screened for CPE were audited to assess compliance to screening and isolation. Findings: Only 23 patients out of 147 (15.6%) were risk assessed on admission. Risk status of 27 (18.4%) patients could not be assessed due to lack of data. Fifteen patients out of 28 (54%) screened for CPE were identified and isolated on admission. Ten out of 19 patients (53%) had three screens 48 h apart. Discussion: This audit highlights difficulties in screening based on individual risk factors as the majority of patients were not screened on admission and documentation on isolation and screening was poor. More needs to be done to raise awareness of the requirements for routine assessment, isolation and screening.
机译:背景:在英国,产碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌科(CPE)的发病率正在增加。2013年,英国公共卫生局(PHE)发布了一个工具包,用于控制CPE在医疗环境中的传播。目的:评估医院CPE政策(改编自PHE)在疑似CPE患者的识别、隔离和筛查中的依从性。方法:对150名患者的入院手册进行评估,查看相关章节是否已完成,以确定高危CPE患者。必要时,对患者进行面谈或联系他们的全科医生,以评估其CPE风险。此外,对28名CPE筛查患者进行了审计,以评估筛查和隔离的依从性。结果:147名患者中只有23名(15.6%)在入院时接受了风险评估。由于缺乏数据,27名(18.4%)患者的风险状况无法评估。在28名(54%)接受CPE筛查的患者中,有15名在入院时被确认和隔离。19名患者中有10名(53%)在48小时内进行了三次筛查。讨论:这项审计强调了基于个体风险因素筛查的困难,因为大多数患者入院时没有进行筛查,隔离和筛查的记录也很差。需要做更多的工作来提高对常规评估、隔离和筛查要求的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号