首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning >The good, the bad, and the statutory: are statutory or non-statutory natural resource management plans higher in quality?
【24h】

The good, the bad, and the statutory: are statutory or non-statutory natural resource management plans higher in quality?

机译:善,坏的和法定:质量上的法定或非法定自然资源管理计划更高?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Numerous governments around the world have adopted statutory mandates on plan content based on the assumption that they lead to greater consistency and higher quality of plans. While a number of studies have examined the relationship between mandates to develop plans and plan quality, there has been limited study of the influence of state mandates for plan content on plan quality in a regional natural resource management (NRM) planning context. This paper explores the relationship between the quality of regional NRM plans between statutory and non-statutory NRM regions in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. An analysis of 22 regional NRM plans indicates that there is no evidence of a relationship between plan quality and the presence of statutory mandates for regional NRM plans in New South Wales and Queensland. However, the paper identifies and discusses several other factors with unexpected relationships with an impact on the quality of NRM plans in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia.
机译:世界各地的许多政府都对计划内容采取了法定授权,基于这样的假设,即这些授权会导致计划的更大一致性和更高质量。虽然有许多研究考察了制定计划的授权与计划质量之间的关系,但在区域自然资源管理(NRM)规划背景下,对计划内容的州授权对计划质量的影响的研究有限。本文探讨了新南威尔士州和澳大利亚昆士兰州的法定和非法定NRM地区之间的区域NRM计划质量之间的关系。对22个区域NRM计划的分析表明,没有证据表明计划质量与新南威尔士州和昆士兰州区域NRM计划的法定授权之间存在关系。然而,本文确定并讨论了影响新南威尔士州和澳大利亚昆士兰NRM计划质量的其他几个因素与意外关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号