...
首页> 外文期刊>Andhra Agricultural Journal >Knowledge, Adoption and Economics of Integrated Pest Management in Paddy in Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh
【24h】

Knowledge, Adoption and Economics of Integrated Pest Management in Paddy in Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh

机译:安得拉邦Vizianagaram区稻田害虫综合治理的知识,采用和经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

On-farm demonstrations of IPM in paddy were carried out by DAATT Centre (District agriculture advisory and transfer of technology centre) in Vizianagaram district, Andhra pradesh for suppressing the crop pests; reducing the cost of production to farmers and ensuring quality produce to the consumers. IPM verification trials were conducted under farmer's conditions as well as large scale implementation of IPM through farmers' participatory approach at five villages in Vizianagaram district of Andhra Pradesh. Adoption of IPM practices resulted in increase in rice yield from 5.45 to 6.33 tonnes/ha in Vizianagaram district during kharif, 2007,2008 & 2009. The cost of plant protection using IPM in paddy is reduced by 31.5% as compared to farmer's practiceof plant protection. The cost-benefit ratio of rice is 2.17 in IPM farmers as compared to 1.85 in Non-IPM farmers. Knowledge and adoption of IPM in paddy was studied in five villages consisting of 20 IPM fanners and non-IPM farmers. Majority of IPM farmer's (50%) had high extension contact and majority of non-IPM farmers had (54%) medium extension contact. Majority of IPM farmers (3 8%) having medium farm holding and majority of non-IPM (44%) were small farmers. Fifty two per cent of the IPM farmers possessed high knowledge level and remaining farmers possessed medium (36%) and low (12%) level knowledge regarding paddy IPM practices. Whereas forty four percent of non-IPM farmers possessed medium level of knowledge followed by high (40%) and low (16%)level of knowledge on paddy IPM. Forty percent of IPM farmers had high adoption level and forty eight percent of IPM farmers had medium adoption level. Thirty two per cent of non-IPM farmers had high adoption level of IPM practices followed by medium level adoption ( 28%). The success of IPM technology through demonstrations were found to be more suitable in increasing the knowledge and adoption level of the paddy farmers.
机译:稻田中IPM的农场示范活动由安得拉邦Vizianagaram区的DAATT中心(地区农业咨询和技术转让中心)进行,目的是抑制农作物害虫。降低农民的生产成本,并确保为消费者提供优质的产品。在农民的条件下进行了IPM验证试验,并在安得拉邦Vizianagaram区的五个村庄通过农民的参与方式大规模实施了IPM。在哈里夫,2007、2008和2009年,采用IPM措施导致Vizianagaram地区的水稻产量从5.45吨/公顷增加到6.33吨/公顷。与农民的植物保护措施相比,在水稻中使用IPM进行植物保护的成本降低了31.5%。 。 IPM农民的稻米成本效益比为2.17,而非IPM农民为1.85。在由20个IPM爱好者和非IPM农民组成的五个村庄中,研究了水稻中IPM的知识和采用情况。 IPM农民的大多数(50%)具有较高的扩展接触,而大多数非IPM农民具有(54%)中等扩展接触。拥有中等规模农场的病虫害综合防治农民多数(3 8%),而非病虫害综合防治的多数(44%)是小农。 IPM农民中有52%的知识水平很高,其余农民对稻米IPM做法的知识水平中等(36%)和低级(12%)。而非IPM农民中有百分之四十四拥有中等水平的知识,其次是稻米IPM的知识水平高(40%)和低(16%)。 IPM农民中有40%的采用率很高,而IPM农民中有48%的采用率中等。非IPM农民中有32%的IPM做法采用率很高,其次是中等级别(28%)。 IPM技术通过示范的成功被发现更适合于增加稻农的知识和采用水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号