首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Association of American Geographers >The Power of Mapping: Considering Discrepancies of Polish Cadastral Mapping
【24h】

The Power of Mapping: Considering Discrepancies of Polish Cadastral Mapping

机译:制图的力量:考虑波兰地籍制图的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In his seminal work on cartography, Brian Harley develops insights and raises questions about the power of maps. This article takes up these insights and questions through an anti-essentialist reading of Foucault's later thinking merged with concepts from grounded theory. The research examines the interrelated economic, strategic, legal, and technical aspects of mapping activities that use and create cadastral (property) maps. Using multiple scales, I analyze cadastral mapping activities through decomposition into interactions, boundary objects, and contextual factors to establish how empowerment and limitation take place. The examples come from fieldwork in Poland that explores cadastral mapping discrepancies. Following the demise of socialist forms of government and property in 1989, studies from the 1990s found differences (by area) between officially mapped ownership and actual property usage of up to 40 percent in rural areas. Although most Polish cadastral maps from rural areas were then, and still are, officially accepted as accurate, many remain functionally unusable. Further, the high level of discrepancies failed, and still fails, to systematically disrupt cadastral mapping, farming, and other economic activities. Considering this background, the article explores the processes of making property rights and the limits of state-centric constructions of territory. Reflecting the increased use of geographic information systems in cadastral mapping and the controls of Common Agricultural Policy disbursements, the article also analyzes different meanings of accuracy and the limits of cadastral mapping's calculative power.
机译:布赖恩·哈雷(Brian Harley)在地图学方面的开创性工作中,获得了见识并提出了有关地图功能的疑问。本文通过对福柯后来的思想与扎根理论的概念相结合的反本质主义读物来探讨这些见解和问题。该研究检查了使用和创建地籍图(属性图)的制图活动的相互关联的经济,战略,法律和技术方面。我使用多个尺度,通过分解为相互作用,边界对象和上下文因素来分析地籍制图活动,以确定授权和限制的发生方式。这些示例来自波兰的田野调查,探讨了地籍制图的差异。随着1989年社会主义形式的政府和财产的消亡,1990年代的研究发现,正式划分的所有权与农村地区实际使用的房地产之间存在差异(按地区划分),高达40%。尽管当时并仍被官方认可大多数来自农村地区的波兰地籍图是准确的,但许多仍然无法使用。此外,高水平的差异未能并且仍然无法系统地破坏地籍测绘,耕作和其他经济活动。考虑到这一背景,本文探讨了制定产权的过程以及以国家为中心的领土建设的局限性。为了反映地籍制图中地理信息系统使用的增加以及共同农业政策支出的控制,文章还分析了地籍制图计算能力的准确性和局限性的不同含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号