首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore >Smartphone Imaging in Ophthalmology: A Comparison with Traditional Methods on the Reproducibility and Usability for Anterior Segment Imaging
【24h】

Smartphone Imaging in Ophthalmology: A Comparison with Traditional Methods on the Reproducibility and Usability for Anterior Segment Imaging

机译:眼科智能手机成像:与传统方法在前节成像可重复性和可用性上的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the reproducibility and usability of anterior segment images taken from a smartphone stabilised on a slit-lamp with those taken from a custom-mounted slit-lamp camera. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, single-blind comparative digital imaging validation study. Digital photographs, of patients with cataract were taken using a smartphone camera (an iPhone 5) on a telescopic mount and a Canon EOS 10D anterior segment camera. Images were graded and compared according to the Lens Opacification Classification System III (LOCS III). Results: A total of 440 anterior segment images were graded independently by 2 ophthalmologists, 2 residents and 2 medical students. Intraclass correlation (ICC) between the iPhone and anterior segment camera images were fair for nuclear opalescence (NO) and nuclear colour (NC), and excellent for cortical (C) and posterior subcapsular (PSC) (NO: ICC 0.40, 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.57; NC: ICC 0.47, 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.66; C: ICC 0.76, 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.81; PSC: ICC 0.81, 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.85). There was no difference in grader impression of confidence and images usability between both cameras (P = 0.66 and P = 0.58, respectively). Conclusion: Anterior segment images taken from an iPhone have good reproducibility for retro-illuminated images, but fair reproducibility for NO and NC under low light settings. There were no differences in grader confidence and subjective image suitability.
机译:简介:这项研究旨在确定从固定在裂隙灯上的智能手机拍摄的前节图像与自定义安装的裂隙灯相机拍摄的前节图像的重现性和可用性。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性,单盲比较的数字成像验证研究。白内障患者的数码照片是使用可伸缩安装的智能手机相机(iPhone 5)和佳能EOS 10D前段相机拍摄的。根据镜头不透明分类系统III(LOCS III)对图像进行分级和比较。结果:2位眼科医生,2位住院医师和2位医学生分别对440张前节图像进行了独立分级。 iPhone和前节摄像头图像之间的类内相关性(ICC)对于核乳光(NO)和核色(NC)是公平的,对于皮质(C)和后囊后膜(PSC)则非常好(NO:ICC 0.40,95%CI ,0.16至0.57; NC:ICC 0.47,95%CI,0.16至0.66; C:ICC 0.76,95%CI,0.71至0.81; PSC:ICC 0.81,95%CI,0.76至0.85)。两台摄像机之间的分级机置信度印象和图像可用性没有差异(分别为P = 0.66和P = 0.58)。结论:从iPhone拍摄的前节图像对后照明图像具有良好的重现性,但在弱光条件下对NO和NC的重现性相当。评分者的置信度和主观图像适应性没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号