首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging and physical activity >Validation of the IPAQ Against Different Accelerometer Cut-Points in Older Cancer Survivors and Adults at Risk of Cancer
【24h】

Validation of the IPAQ Against Different Accelerometer Cut-Points in Older Cancer Survivors and Adults at Risk of Cancer

机译:验证IPAQ对癌症患者和成人癌症的不同加速度计切割点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present study investigated the convergent validity of an interview-administered IPAQ long version (IPAQ-L) in an older population by comparison with objective accelerometry movement data. Data from 52 participants (mean age 67.9 years, 62% male) were included in the analysis. Treadmill derived (TM-ACC: 1,952-5,724 cpm) and free-living physical activity (PA) derived (FL-ACC: 760-5,724 cpm) accelerometer cut-points were used as criterion. IPAQ-L measures (total PA, leisure-time, walking-time, sedentary time) were significantly correlated with accelerometry (P = .05). Differences in sex were observed. Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement analysis showed that the IPAQ-L overestimated PA in relation to accelerometry. Our results show that an interview-administered IPAQ-L shows low to moderate convergent validity with objective PA measures in this population but there may be differences between males and females which should be further investigated.
机译:本研究通过与客观加速度测量运动数据的比较,研究了在老年人群中接受采访的IPAQ长版本(IPAQ-L)的收敛有效性。52名参与者(平均年龄67.9岁,62%为男性)的数据被纳入分析。以跑步机(TM-ACC:1952-5724 cpm)和自由生活体力活动(PA)加速计(FL-ACC:760-5724 cpm)切点为标准。IPAQ-L测量值(总PA、休闲时间、步行时间、久坐时间)与加速度计显著相关(P;=0.05)。观察性别差异。Bland Altman一致性极限分析表明,IPAQ-L高估了加速度计相关的PA。我们的研究结果表明,在这一人群中,使用IPAQ-L进行的访谈显示,客观PA测量的收敛效度为低到中等,但男性和女性之间可能存在差异,需要进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号