首页> 外文期刊>Digital machinist >More Comments on Current Flow
【24h】

More Comments on Current Flow

机译:更多关于当前流程的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Mr. Bates, First let me thank you for reading my article. It is nice to know it was read at least twice (our editor read it) and makes the effort put into producing it worthwhile. Your point (Summer 2020 Inbox) that other carriers of electric current were left out is correct, but they were not included purposely. The point of the article was to discuss the two theories of direction of electrical current flow. Now, I am sure that the readership of Digital Machinist includes readers well versed in electronics, as you yourself are, but the article was not intended as a textbook chapter on electricity.
机译:贝茨先生,首先感谢您阅读我的文章。很高兴知道它至少被读了两遍(我们的编辑读过),并且使制作它的努力值得。你的观点(Summer 2020收件箱)是正确的,其他电流载体被遗漏了,但它们并不是故意被包括在内的。本文的重点是讨论电流方向的两种理论。现在,我相信《数字机械师》的读者群包括精通电子技术的读者,就像你们自己一样,但这篇文章并不是作为教科书中关于电的章节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号