...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Cognition >Testing problem-solving capacities: differences between individual testing and social group setting
【24h】

Testing problem-solving capacities: differences between individual testing and social group setting

机译:测试解决问题的能力:个人测试与社会群体设置之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Testing animals individually in problem-solving tasks limits distractions of the subjects during the test, so that they can fully concentrate on the problem. However, such individual performance may not indicate the problem-solving capacity that is commonly employed in the wild when individuals are faced with a novel problem in their social groups, where the presence of a conspecific influences an individual's behaviour. To assess the validity of data gathered from parrots when tested individually, we compared the performance on patterned-string tasks among parrots tested singly and parrots tested in social context. We tested two captive groups of orange-winged amazons (Amazona amazonica) with several patterned-string tasks. Despite the differences in the testing environment (singly vs. social context), parrots from both groups performed similarly. However, we found that the willingness to participate in the tasks was significantly higher for the individuals tested in social context. The study provides further evidence for the crucial influence of social context on individual's response to a challenging situation such as a problem-solving test
机译:在解决问题的任务中单独测试动物会限制测试过程中受试者的注意力,从而使他们可以完全专注于问题。但是,当个人在其社会群体中面临新问题时,这种个人表现可能并不表示通常在野外使用的解决问题的能力,其中同种生物的存在会影响个人的行为。为了评估单独测试时从鹦鹉收集的数据的有效性,我们比较了单独测试的鹦鹉和社交环境中测试的鹦鹉在模式字符串任务上的性能。我们测试了两组带有多个图案化字符串任务的橙色翅膀亚马逊(Amazona amazonica)俘虏。尽管测试环境有所不同(单个环境与社交环境),但两组鹦鹉的表现相似。但是,我们发现,在社交环境中测试的个人参加任务的意愿明显更高。该研究提供了进一步的证据,说明社会背景对个人应对挑战性情况(例如解决问题的测试)的反应的关键影响

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号