...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >'LMICs as reservoirs of AMR': a comparative analysis of policy discourse on antimicrobial resistance with reference to Pakistan
【24h】

'LMICs as reservoirs of AMR': a comparative analysis of policy discourse on antimicrobial resistance with reference to Pakistan

机译:'LMICS作为AMR的水库':参考巴基斯坦对抗微生物抗性的政策话语的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has recently emerged as a salient global issue, and policy formulation to address AMR has become a contested space, with various actors sharing competingand sometimes contradictoryexplanations of the problem and the range of possible solutions. To facilitate national policy setting and implementation around AMR, more needs to be done to effectively engage policymakers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is a dearth of research on differences in issue framing by external agencies and LMIC's national policymakers on the problem of AMR; such analyses are imperative to identify areas of conflict and/or potential convergence. We compared representations of AMR across nine policy documents produced by multilateral agencies, donor countries and an LMIC at the forefront of the global response to AMRPakistan. We analysed the texts in relation to five narratives that have been commonly used to frame health issues as requiring action: economic impact, stunting of human development, consequences for health equity, health security threats and relationship with food production. We found that AMR was most frequently framed as a threat to human health security and economic progress, with several US, UK and international documents depicting LMICs as hotspots' for AMR. Human development and equity dimensions of the problem were less frequently discussed as reasons to address the growing burden of AMR. It is clear that no single coherent narrative on AMR has emerged, with notable differences in framing in Pakistani and external agency led documents, as well as across stakeholders primarily working on human vs animal health. While framing AMR as a threat to economic growth and human security has achieved high-level political attention and catalysed action from governments in high-income countries, our analysis suggests that conflicting narratives relevant to policymakers in Pakistan may affect policy-making and impede the development and implementation of integrated initiatives needed to tackle AMR.
机译:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)最近已成为一个突出的全球问题,解决AMR的政策制定已成为一个有争议的领域,各个参与者对该问题和可能的解决方案的解释存在竞争,有时甚至相互矛盾。为了促进围绕AMR的国家政策制定和实施,需要做更多的工作来有效地让中低收入国家(LMIC)的决策者参与进来。然而,对于外部机构和LMIC的国家政策制定者在AMR问题上的问题框架差异,缺乏研究;这种分析对于确定冲突和/或潜在趋同的领域至关重要。我们比较了多边机构、捐助国和处于全球应对AMRPakistan最前沿的LMIC制定的九份政策文件中对AMR的表述。我们分析了与五种叙事相关的文本,这五种叙事通常用于将健康问题界定为需要采取行动的问题:经济影响、人类发展受阻、对健康公平的后果、健康安全威胁以及与粮食生产的关系。我们发现,AMR最常被视为对人类健康安全和经济进步的威胁,一些美国、英国和国际文件将LMIC描述为AMR的热点。作为解决AMR日益加重的负担的原因,该问题的人类发展和公平层面很少被讨论。很明显,没有出现关于AMR的单一连贯叙述,巴基斯坦和外部机构主导的文件以及主要致力于人类和动物健康的利益相关者在框架上存在显著差异。虽然将AMR定义为对经济增长和人类安全的威胁已经引起了高收入国家政府的高度政治关注和催化行动,但我们的分析表明,与巴基斯坦决策者相关的相互冲突的叙事可能会影响政策制定,并阻碍解决AMR所需的综合举措的制定和实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号