...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Advocacy coalitions and the transfer of nutrition policy to Zambia
【24h】

Advocacy coalitions and the transfer of nutrition policy to Zambia

机译:宣传联盟与营养政策转移到赞比亚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Stunted growth in children and multisectoral action to address it are dominant ideas in the international nutrition community today, and this study finds that these ideas are increasingly evident over time in nutrition policy in Zambia, with stunting largely displacing other framings of nutrition. This study is based on key informant interviews (70 interviews with 61 interviewees), policy document review, and social network mapping, with iterative data collection and analysis taking place over 6 years (2011-2016). Analysis was based on two established political science theories: policy transfer theory and the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy changes in Zambia are shown to result from the international community's nutrition agenda, transferred to national policy through the normative promotion of certain ways of understanding the issue of malnutrition, largely propagated through advocacy, technical assistance and funding. With its focus on multisectoral action to reduce stunting, the recent nutrition policy narrative impinges directly on an existing food security narrative as it attempts to alter agriculture policy away from maize reliance. The nutrition policy sub-system in Zambia is therefore split between an international coalition promoting action on child stunting, and a national coalition focused on food security and hunger, with implications for both sides on progressing a coherent policy agenda. This study finds that it is possible to understand policy processes for nutrition more fully than has so far been achieved in much nutrition literature through the application of multiple political science theories. These theories allow the generalization of findings from this case study to assess their relevance in other contexts: the study ultimately is about the transfer of policy being explained by the presence of advocacy coalitions and their different beliefs, resources and power, and these concepts can be investigated wherever the nutrition system reaches down from international to national level.
机译:儿童发育迟缓和采取多部门行动解决这一问题是当今国际营养界的主导观点,本研究发现,随着时间的推移,这些观点在赞比亚的营养政策中越来越明显,发育迟缓在很大程度上取代了其他营养方面的缺陷。本研究基于关键线人访谈(70次访谈,61名受访者)、政策文件审查和社交网络映射,并在6年(2011-2016年)内反复收集和分析数据。分析基于两种已确立的政治学理论:政策转移理论和倡导联盟框架。赞比亚的政策变化源于国际社会的营养议程,通过规范性地促进理解营养不良问题的某些方式,将其转变为国家政策,主要通过宣传、技术援助和资金传播。最近的营养政策叙事以多部门行动减少发育迟缓为重点,它试图改变农业政策,摆脱对玉米的依赖,直接冲击了现有的粮食安全叙事。因此,赞比亚的营养政策分为促进儿童发育迟缓行动的国际联盟和专注于粮食安全和饥饿问题的全国联盟,这对双方推进连贯的政策议程都有影响。这项研究发现,通过应用多种政治学理论,可以比迄今为止在许多营养文献中更全面地理解营养政策过程。这些理论可以概括本案例研究的结果,以评估其在其他环境中的相关性:该研究最终是关于政策的转移,由倡导联盟的存在及其不同的信仰、资源和权力来解释,这些概念可以在营养系统从国际到国家的任何地方进行调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号