首页> 外文期刊>World Rabbit Science >TYPOLOGY AND SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF RABBIT FARMS IN THE URBAN AND PERI-URBAN AREAS OF SOUTHERN BENIN (WEST AFRICA)
【24h】

TYPOLOGY AND SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF RABBIT FARMS IN THE URBAN AND PERI-URBAN AREAS OF SOUTHERN BENIN (WEST AFRICA)

机译:北贝宁市区城市和围城地区兔农场的类型学和可持续发展评估(西非)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Analysis of production systems allows scientists to identify their weaknesses, particularly concerning production practices which require improvements at economic, social, and environmental levels. The present study aimed to characterise rabbit farms In the urban and peri-urban areas of South Benin and assess their sustainability using the DIAMOND method, a multicriteria sustainability assessment tool. Ninety-eight farmers were surveyed and Individually Interviewed. Categorical principal component and two-step cluster analyses were performed on Information collected for a typology of farms. Sustainability scores were generated using the scoring scale of the DIAMOND tool. Five types of rabbit farms were Identified as follows: modern extensive polyculture, traditional extensive monoculture, modern extensive monoculture, semi-Intensive polyculture, and traditional extensive polyculture. Overall, all the rabbit farms had good scores for the economic sustainability pillar but were socially limited. They were all similar in their economic and environmental performances. In particular, semi-intensive farms were the most socially sustainable, whereas traditional farms (either in polyculture or monoculture) showed the lowest social performances. Furthermore, there were significant differences between farms for criteria relating to consumers' demands and resource use. Semi-intensive farms responded best to consumers' demands, whereas the traditional polyculture farm type was the most resource use efficient. Overall, in the urban and pert-urban areas of South Benin, the most sustainable rabbit farms were semi-intensive. Irrespective of farm type, positive coefficients of correlations were recorded among the three pillars of sustainability, being significant between the social and economic pillars on one hand, and between the social and environmental pillars on the other hand. These results suggest that efforts to improve farm social performance would also positively affect their economic and environmental performances and Improve overall farm sustainability.
机译:通过对生产系统的分析,科学家可以发现他们的弱点,尤其是在经济、社会和环境层面需要改进的生产实践方面。本研究旨在描述贝宁南部城市和城市周边地区兔子养殖场的特征,并使用钻石法(一种多标准可持续性评估工具)评估其可持续性。调查了98名农民,并对他们进行了单独采访。对为农场类型收集的信息进行分类主成分和两步聚类分析。使用钻石工具的评分量表生成可持续性评分。确定了五种养兔场类型:现代粗放式混养、传统粗放式单养、现代粗放式单养、半集约式混养和传统粗放式混养。总的来说,所有的兔子养殖场在经济可持续性支柱方面得分都很高,但在社会方面受到限制。它们在经济和环境方面的表现都很相似。特别是,半集约化农场的社会可持续性最高,而传统农场(混养或单一栽培)的社会绩效最低。此外,农场之间在消费者需求和资源使用方面的标准存在显著差异。半集约化农场最能满足消费者的需求,而传统的混养农场类型是资源利用效率最高的。总的来说,在贝宁南部的城市和珀特城市地区,最可持续的兔子养殖场是半集约式的。无论农场类型如何,可持续性的三大支柱之间都存在正相关系数,一方面在社会和经济支柱之间显著,另一方面在社会和环境支柱之间显著。这些结果表明,改善农场社会绩效的努力也将对其经济和环境绩效产生积极影响,并提高农场的整体可持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号