首页> 外文期刊>Visual Communication >Which way did he go? Film lateral movement and spectator interpretation
【24h】

Which way did he go? Film lateral movement and spectator interpretation

机译:他走了哪种方式? 薄膜横向运动和观众解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Elements of on-screen motion in film hold specific meanings and contexts depending on their usage in the moving image. The common wisdom that left-to-right is primary, preferred, and evaluated as more positive has not been directly tested with spectator responses. This study focuses on how film spectators interpret lateral motion, comparing left-to-right and right-to-left. A posttest only experimental design utilized footage from a short film as the stimulus. Participants completed a questionnaire after watching the sequence, answering items concerning affective and perceptual evaluations of the sequence. ANOVAs showed a significant difference between the experimental groups on the Positive Affect spectator evaluation scale and the Activity scale, such that right-to-left motion was perceived more negatively and as less active. There were no differences in the Uniqueness scale. Additionally, the study found no support for potential moderating impacts of religion or psychometric characteristics, indicating robustness of the main findings.
机译:电影中的屏幕运动元素具有特定的含义和上下文,这取决于它们在运动图像中的用法。人们普遍认为,从左到右是主要的、首选的、被评价为更积极的,但这一观点并没有通过观众的反应直接得到检验。这项研究的重点是电影观众如何解释横向运动,比较从左到右和从右到左。一项仅在测试后进行的实验设计利用了一部短片的片段作为刺激。参与者在观看该序列后完成一份问卷,回答与该序列的情感和知觉评估有关的项目。ANOVAs显示,实验组在积极影响观众评价量表和活动量表上存在显著差异,因此从右向左的运动被认为更消极,更不活跃。在独特性量表上没有差异。此外,该研究没有发现宗教或心理测量特征的潜在调节影响,表明主要发现的稳健性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号