【24h】

Comparison of standard versus orthogonal ECG leads for T-wave alternans identification

机译:比较标准心电图和正交心电图导联用于T波交替体识别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

T-wave alternans (TWA), an electrophysiologic phenomenon associated with ventricular arrhythmias, is usually detected from selected ECG leads. TWA amplitude measured in the 12-standard and the 3-orthogonal (vectorcardiographic) leads were compared here to identify which lead system yields a more adequate detection of TWA as a noninvasive marker for cardiac vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. Our adaptive match filter (AMF) was applied to exercise ECG tracings from 58 patients with an implanted cardiac defibrillator, 29 of which had ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation during follow-up (cases), while the remaining 29 were used as controls. Two kinds of TWA indexes were considered, the single-lead indexes, defined as the mean TWA amplitude over each lead (MTWAA), and lead-system indexes, defined as the mean and the maximum MTWAA values over the standard leads and over the orthogonal leads. Significantly (P < 0.05) higher TWA in the cases versus controls was identified only occasionally by the single-lead indexes (odds ratio: 1.0-9.9, sensitivity: 24-76%, specificity: 76-86%), and consistently by the lead-system indexes (odds ratio: 4.5-8.3, sensitivity: 57-72%, specificity: 76%). The latter indexes also showed a significant correlation (0.65-0.83) between standard and orthogonal leads. Hence, when using the AMF, TWA should be detected in all leads of a system to compute the lead-system indexes, which provide a more reliable TWA identification than single-lead indexes, and a better discrimination of patients at increased risk of cardiac instability. The standard and the orthogonal leads can be considered equivalent for TWA identification, so that TWA analysis can be limited to one-lead system.
机译:通常从选定的ECG导联中检测到T波交替蛋白(TWA),这是一种与室性心律不齐相关的电生理现象。在此处比较了12根标准导线和3根正交(矢量心电图)导线中测得的TWA振幅,以确定哪种导线系统可以更充分地检测出TWA,将其作为心脏无心律失常的无创标记。我们的自适应匹配滤波器(AMF)被用于对58例植入了心脏除颤器的患者进行心电图描记,其中29例在随访期间发生了室性心动过速或心律颤动(病例),其余29例用作对照。考虑了两种TWA指标,即单导联指标(定义为每根导联的平均TWA振幅(MTWAA))和导联系统指标(定义为标准导联和正交线上的平均和最大MTWAA值)线索。仅通过单导联指标(比值比:1.0-9.9,敏感性:24-76%,特异性:76-86%)偶尔发现与对照组相比,TWA显着(P <0.05)更高,并且一致地通过铅系统指标(赔率:4.5-8.3,敏感性:57-72%,特异性:76%)。后者的索引还显示标准引线和正交引线之间的显着相关性(0.65-0.83)。因此,在使用AMF时,应在系统的所有导线中检测TWA以计算导线系统指标,从而比单导线指标提供更可靠的TWA识别,并更好地区分心脏不稳定风险增加的患者。 TWA识别可以将标准引线和正交引线视为等效,因此TWA分析可以限于单引线系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号