首页> 外文期刊>Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology >Double-blind randomised trial comparing the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors letrozole and fadrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
【24h】

Double-blind randomised trial comparing the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors letrozole and fadrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

机译:一项双盲随机试验,比较了绝经后晚期乳腺癌女性中非甾体芳香酶抑制剂来曲唑和法得唑的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of letrozole, an advanced non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor, and fadrozole hydrochloride, an older-generation drug in this class, we conducted a randomised double-blind trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive letrozole or fadrozole in a multicentre, randomised double-blind trial in Japan. One hundred and fifty-four eligible patients were treated with either letrozole 1.0 mg once daily (n = 77) or fadrozole 1.0 mg twice daily (n = 77), for a minimum of 8 weeks. RESULTS: Letrozole showed a significantly higher overall objective response rate [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] than fadrozole (31.2% and 13.0%, respectively; P = 0.011, Fisher's exact test). Clinical benefits defined as CR, PR and stable disease (no change in status for more than 24 weeks) were also higherin patients treated with letrozole (50.6%) than fadrozole (35.1%). Letrozole was significantly superior to fadrozole in terms of the dominant lesion in soft tissue, bone and viscera (P = 0.011, stratified Mantel-Haenszel test). Median time to progression was 211 days in the letrozole group and 113 days in the fadrozole group with no significant difference (P = 0.175, log-rank test). Letrozole markedly reduced the estradiol, estrone and estrone sulfate levels in peripheral blood within 4 weeks. The suppressive effect of fadrozole on these hormone levels was insufficient. Adverse drug reactions were observed in 35.9% of the patients treated with letrozole and in 39.5% of those treated with fadrozole with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.74, Fisher's exact test). Most of the adverse drug reactions were rated as grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: The results show letrozole at a dose of 1.0 mg once daily to be more effective in treating postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer than fadrozoleat 1.0 mg twice daily, with similar safety and tolerability profiles.
机译:背景:为了比较先进的非类固醇芳香化酶抑制剂来曲唑和该类别中较老一代的药物盐酸盐酸法卓唑的疗效,安全性和耐受性,我们对绝经后晚期乳腺癌妇女进行了一项随机双盲试验。患者和方法:在日本进行的一项多中心,随机,双盲试验中,纳入了157名患有晚期乳腺癌的绝经后妇女并随机分配接受来曲唑或法替唑。 154名符合条件的患者接受了每天一次的来曲唑1.0 mg(n = 77)或每天两次的fadrozole 1.0 mg(n = 77)治疗,持续至少8周。结果:来曲唑的总体客观缓解率[完全缓解(CR)+部分缓解(PR)]显着高于法卓唑(分别为31.2%和13.0%; P = 0.011,Fisher精确检验)。来曲唑治疗的患者(50.6%)的临床获益(CR,PR和稳定疾病(状态变化超过24周)也高于法托唑(35.1%)。就软组织,骨骼和内脏的主要病变而言,来曲唑明显优于法得唑(P = 0.011,分层Mantel-Haenszel试验)。来曲唑组的中位进展时间为211天,法曲唑组的中位进展时间为113天,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.175,对数秩检验)。来曲唑在4周内显着降低了外周血中雌二醇,雌酮和硫酸雌酮的水平。法德唑对这些激素水平的抑制作用不足。在接受来曲唑治疗的患者中有35.9%的患者发生了药物不良反应,而在使用fadrozole治疗的患者中有39.5%的患者发生了药物不良反应,两组之间无显着差异(P = 0.74,Fisher精确检验)。结论:结果显示,来曲唑每天1.0 mg的剂量比绝经后妇女1.0 mg每天两次,来曲唑每天1.0 mg的剂量更有效,且安全性相似。和公差配置文件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号