...
首页> 外文期刊>Quintessence international >Are YouTube videos useful as a source of information for oral care of leukemia patients?
【24h】

Are YouTube videos useful as a source of information for oral care of leukemia patients?

机译:YouTube视频是否有用作为白血病患者口腔护理的信息来源?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: Video sharing sites are a popular and useful way to spread information. The aim of this study was to evaluate information about oral care for leukemia patients and quality of information related to videos available on YouTube. Method and materials: In this cross-sectional study, YouTube videos were analyzed according to the information content.The search was performed in English and using the search term: leukemia/oral care. The following information was registered: date of upload, source of upload, duration, total views, number of likes, number of dislikes, number of comments, overall quality. The overall quality of videos was assessed using the following quality criteria presented in the Global Quality Scale (GQS): poor, generally poor, moderate, good, and excellent. In addition, videos were classified as useful, misleading, and patient personal experience. Videos were assessed in terms of definition, etiology, pathogen-esis, symptoms, treatment, and oral care for leukemia. Results: Sixty-three videos (78.8%) were classified as useful, 6 (7.5%) as misleading and 11 (13.8%) as a patient's personal experience. Thirteen videos (16.3%) discussed the definition of leukemia, 8 (10.0%) discussed etiology, 6 (7.5%) discussed pathogenesis, 7 (8.8%) discussed symptoms of leukemia, 50 (62.5%) discussed treatment choices, and 15 videos (18.8%) discussed oral care of leukemia. Thirteen videos (16.3%) were assessed as poor, 17 (21.3%) as generally poor, 39 (48.8%) as moderate, 10 (12.5%) as good quality, and 1 (1.3%) as excellent. There was a significant difference between the content of videos and the number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments (P < .05).There was a significant difference between the content of videos and number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments (P=. 007, P=. 006, P = .049, and P = .011 respectively). There was no significant difference between demographic parameters and quality of video. There was no significant difference between demographic parameters (except duration, P = .025) and source of information. Conclusions: YouTube is a useful source of information on leukemia. Health care professionals should take into consideration that YouTube is an effective information tool for the patient.
机译:目标:视频分享网站是一种流行且有用的信息传播方式。这项研究的目的是评估白血病患者的口腔护理信息以及YouTube上视频相关信息的质量。方法和材料:在这项横断面研究中,根据信息内容分析YouTube视频。搜索是用英语进行的,使用的搜索词是:白血病/口腔护理。注册了以下信息:上传日期、上传来源、持续时间、总浏览量、喜欢次数、不喜欢次数、评论次数、整体质量。使用全球质量量表(GQS)中的以下质量标准评估视频的整体质量:差、一般差、中等、好和优秀。此外,视频被归类为有用、误导和患者个人体验。从白血病的定义、病因、病原体、症状、治疗和口腔护理等方面对视频进行评估。结果:63个视频(78.8%)被归类为有用,6个(7.5%)被归类为误导,11个(13.8%)被归类为患者的个人经历。13个视频(16.3%)讨论了白血病的定义,8个(10.0%)讨论了病因,6个(7.5%)讨论了发病机制,7个(8.8%)讨论了白血病的症状,50个(62.5%)讨论了治疗选择,15个视频(18.8%)讨论了白血病的口腔护理。13个视频(16.3%)被评定为较差,17个(21.3%)被评定为一般较差,39个(48.8%)被评定为中等,10个(12.5%)被评定为良好,1个(1.3%)被评定为优秀。视频内容与观看次数、喜欢次数、不喜欢次数和评论次数之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。视频内容与观看次数、喜欢次数、不喜欢次数和评论次数之间存在显著差异(分别P=0.007、P=0.006、P=0.049和P=0.011)。人口统计学参数和视频质量之间没有显著差异。人口统计学参数(持续时间除外,P=0.025)和信息来源之间没有显著差异。结论:YouTube是白血病信息的有用来源。医疗保健专业人士应该考虑到YouTube是一个有效的患者信息工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号