首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine >THE BEST INTEREST STANDARD same name but different roles in pediatric bioethics and child rights frameworks
【24h】

THE BEST INTEREST STANDARD same name but different roles in pediatric bioethics and child rights frameworks

机译:最佳利益标准同名,但儿科生物伦理和儿童权利框架的不同作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article explores the intersection of pediatric bioethics and child rights by examining the best interest standard as it operates within the pediatric bioethics framework in the United States and the child rights framework based on the UN 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). While the "best interest of the child" standard is central to both pediatric bioethics and the child rights community, it operates only as a guidance principle, and not as an intervention principle, in decision-making within U.S. pediatric bioethics, whereas it operates as both a guidance and intervention principle in the child rights community. The differences in how the best interest standard is operationalized lead to different roles for the family, the state, and the minor in decision-making processes and outcomes. We examine the recent case of Charlie Gard to illustrate some of these differences.
机译:本文探讨了儿科生物伦理学与儿童权利的交叉点,考察了最佳利益标准在美国儿科生物伦理学框架和基于联合国1989年《儿童权利公约》(CRC)的儿童权利框架内的运作。虽然“儿童的最大利益”标准对儿科生物伦理学和儿童权利团体都至关重要,但它在美国儿科生物伦理学的决策中仅作为指导原则,而不是干预原则,而在儿童权利团体中作为指导和干预原则。最佳利益标准实施方式的差异导致家庭、国家和未成年人在决策过程和结果中扮演不同的角色。我们通过查理加德最近的案例来说明其中的一些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号