首页> 外文期刊>Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology >Temporal Changes in the Hindgut Health Markers of Labrador Dogs in Response to a Canine- origin Probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii
【24h】

Temporal Changes in the Hindgut Health Markers of Labrador Dogs in Response to a Canine- origin Probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii

机译:拉布拉多犬后肠健康标志物对犬源性益生菌约翰逊乳杆菌的反应的时间变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To study the temporal changes in the hindgut health markers in response to a canine-origin probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii, 15 Labrador adult female dogs were distributed into three equal groups. Dogs in control group (CON) received a placebo MRS broth in the homemade basal diet as per the NRC recommendations. In other two groups, dogs received either canine-origin probiotic (Lactobacillus johnsonii isolated from dog faeces) developed at our laboratory (cPRO) or dairy-origin probiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDC-15; dPRO) in the same basal diet The experimental duration of 13-weeks in which feeding of probiotics discontinue after 9-weeks, had experimental protocol involving 3-d digestion trial following 0, 30, 60, 75 and 90 d of feeding to ascertain physical, biochemical and microbial assessment of faecal markers. The digestibility of DM remained similar (P>0.05) irrespective of dietary treatments. Faecal biochemical attributes including pH, lactate and ammonia implied positive influence of probiotic supplementation and the positive influence were more evident in canine-origin probiotic supplemented group. Faecal acetate was higher (P<0.05) in dogs of cPRO group as compared to CON, however intermediate values were recorded in dPRO group. Faecal propionate remained unaffected (P>0.05) among all the groups. There was significant (P<0.01) increase in faecal butyrate in both the probiotics fed groups as compared to CON. The faecal concentrations of total VFAs and SCFAs in fresh faeces were higher (P<0.05) in cPRO compared to other two groups. Faecal count of health-positive and health-negative bacteria revealed that lactobacillus count exhibited higher (P<0.05) values in cPRO, intermediate in dPRO and lower value in CON, with the bifidobacteria population showing highest (P<0.05) value in the both the probiotics supplemented animals. There was a reducing effect in the health-negative clostridia and coliforms in cPRO and dPRO compared to CON. Overall, the results concluded that Probiotic supplementation was effective in improving the hind gut health, antioxidant and metabolic response in dogs. However, the present results are indicative of the superiority of canine-origin probiotic (cPRO) over the dairy-origin (dPRO) one, so far as its application for canines is concerned.
机译:为了研究后肠健康标志物对犬源性益生菌约翰逊乳杆菌的反应的时间变化,将15只拉布拉多成年雌性狗分为三组。根据NRC的建议,对照组(CON)的狗在自制基础饮食中接受了安慰剂MRS肉汤。在其他两组中,狗在相同的基础饮食中接受了我们实验室开发的犬源益生菌(从狗粪便中分离出的约翰逊乳酸杆菌)(cPRO)或乳源益生菌(嗜酸乳杆菌NCDC-15; dPRO)。益生菌在9周后停止喂食的13周实验方案包括在喂食0、30、60、75和90 d后进行3-d消化试验,以确定粪便标记物的物理,生化和微生物评估。 DM的消化率保持相似(P> 0.05),与饮食疗法无关。粪便的生化特性(包括pH,乳酸和氨水)暗示了益生菌补充剂的积极影响,而犬源性益生菌补充剂组的积极影响更为明显。与CON相比,cPRO组犬的粪便乙酸盐含量更高(P <0.05),但是在dPRO组中记录到中间值。在所有组中,粪便丙酸酯均未受影响(P> 0.05)。与CON相比,两个益生菌喂养组的粪便丁酸含量都有显着(P <0.01)增加。与其他两组相比,cPRO中新鲜粪便中总VFA和SCFA的粪便浓度更高(P <0.05)。健康阳性和健康阴性细菌的粪便计数表明,乳酸杆菌计数在cPRO中显示较高(P <0.05)值,在dPRO中显示中间值,在CON中显示较低值,双歧杆菌群体在这两个方面均显示最高(P <0.05)值益生菌补充了动物。与CON相比,cPRO和dPRO对健康阴性的梭状芽胞杆菌和大肠菌群有减少作用。总体而言,结果得出结论,补充益生菌可有效改善狗的后肠健康,抗氧化和代谢反应。但是,目前的结果表明,就其在犬类中的应用而言,犬源性益生菌(cPRO)优于乳源性(dPRO)益生菌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号