...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology >Probability and pragmatism in penicillin allergy evaluations.
【24h】

Probability and pragmatism in penicillin allergy evaluations.

机译:青霉素过敏评估中的概率和实用主义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A recent Annals review stated that the negative predictive value (NPV) of skin testing for identifying patients with immediate penicillin hypersensitivity was 97% to 99%. The NPV is important because physicians must weigh the possibility of a serious allergic reaction, such as an alternative drug's adverse effects and resistance development, against the consequences of not using a beta-lactam. A decision analysis model argued for switching to an alternative antibiotic when there is a 1:100 chance of a severe allergic reaction without performing skin testing to confirm or deny sensitivity because the results of skin testing would not change therapy given the thresholds obtained from a number of clinicians. An example was submitted: a syphilis patient who 5 years earlier had urticaria on the third day of ampicillin treatment would be offered only alternative antibiotic treatment (tetracycline) instead of penicillin testing.
机译:最近的《 Annals》评论指出,皮肤测试用于鉴定立即有青霉素超敏反应的患者的阴性预测值(NPV)为97%至99%。 NPV很重要,因为医师必须权衡严重过敏反应的可能性,例如替代药物的不良反应和耐药性发展,以及不使用β-内酰胺的后果。决策分析模型认为,如果有1:100的严重过敏反应而没有进行皮肤测试以确认或否认敏感性的情况下,应选择替代抗生素,因为从一定数量的阈值出发,皮肤测试的结果不会改变治疗方案的临床医生。提交了一个示例:5年前在氨苄青霉素治疗的第三天出现荨麻疹的梅毒患者,仅接受替代性抗生素治疗(四环素)替代青霉素测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号