...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Soil Science >On inorganic N uptake by vascular plants: Can N-15 tracer techniques resolve the NH4+ versus NO3- 'preference' conundrum?
【24h】

On inorganic N uptake by vascular plants: Can N-15 tracer techniques resolve the NH4+ versus NO3- 'preference' conundrum?

机译:血管植物的无机N吸收:N-15跟踪技术可以解决NH4 +与NO3-“偏好”难题?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The relative uptake by plants of the two ionic nitrogen (N) forms, ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-), has been the subject of much interest during the past 50 years, resulting in a considerable scientific literature. The general idea is that plants have choice, resulting in preference for either one mineral N form or the other. Unfortunately, there is no specific definition of preference or agreement on how it should be measured. In this review, we critically examine the alternative techniques that have been used to measure the relative uptake of NH4+ and NO3- by plants, including those based on unlabelled sources, N-15-enriched mineral N forms and variations in the N-15 natural abundance of mineral N sources. The main difficulty with using unlabelled N is the antecedent N in plant tissue prior to the imposition of treatments. Although N-15-enrichment overcomes this obstacle, it is nevertheless difficult to separate uptake as (NH4+)-N-15, uptake as (NO3-)-N-15 and uptake as (NO3-)-N-15 derived from the nitrification of (NH4+)-N-15. With N-15 natural abundance, isotopic fractionation during plant uptake complicates the interpretation of data. There is increasing evidence that plants exhibit flexibility or plasticity with respect to the use of mineral N forms rather than preference.
机译:None

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号