首页> 外文期刊>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry >Application of normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography followed by gas chromatography for analytics of diesel fuel additives
【24h】

Application of normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography followed by gas chromatography for analytics of diesel fuel additives

机译:正相高效液相色谱-气相色谱法在柴油添加剂分析中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper presents the results of investigations on new procedures of determination of selected cleaning additives in diesel fuel. Two procedures: one-step analysis using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) or mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and a two-step procedure in which normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC) was used for preliminary separation of the additives, were compared. The additive fraction was collected using either simple elution or eluent backflush. Final determinations were performed by GC-FID and GC-MS. The studies revealed that it was impossible to determine the investigated analytes by one-step procedures, i.e. by using solely HPLC or GC. On the other hand, the use of a two-step procedure ensures reproducible results of determinations, and the limits of quantitation are, depending on the method of fraction collection by HPLC, from 1.4-2.2 ppm (GC-MS in SIM mode) to 9.6-24.0 ppm (GC-FID). Precision and accuracy of the developed procedures are compared, and possible determination errors and shortcomings discussed. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
机译:本文介绍了对确定柴油中所选清洁添加剂的新程序进行调查的结果。分两个步骤:使用带火焰离子化检测的气相色谱仪(GC-FID)或质谱(GC-MS)进行一步分析,以及使用正相高效液相色谱法(NP-HPLC)进行的两步程序对用于添加剂的初步分离进行了比较。使用简单的洗脱液或反洗液收集添加剂馏分。通过GC-FID和GC-MS进行最终确定。研究表明,不可能通过一步步骤即单独使用HPLC或GC来确定所研究的分析物。另一方面,使用两步法可确保测定结果可重复,根据HPLC馏分收集方法的不同,定量限为1.4-2.2 ppm(SIM模式下为GC-MS)至9.6-24.0 ppm(GC-FID)。比较了所开发程序的准确性和准确性,并讨论了可能的确定错误和缺点。 [图不可用:请参见全文。]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号