...
首页> 外文期刊>Agronomy Journal >Reply to: Comment on 'Soybean Aphid Population Dynamics, Soybean Yield Loss, and Development of Stage-Specific Economic Injury Levels' by M. A. Catangui, E. A. Beckendorf, and W. E. Riedell, Agron.J. 101:1080-1092(2009)
【24h】

Reply to: Comment on 'Soybean Aphid Population Dynamics, Soybean Yield Loss, and Development of Stage-Specific Economic Injury Levels' by M. A. Catangui, E. A. Beckendorf, and W. E. Riedell, Agron.J. 101:1080-1092(2009)

机译:答复:M. A. Catangui,E。A. Beckendorf和W. E. Riedell,Agron.J。对“大豆蚜虫种群动态,大豆产量损失和特定阶段的经济伤害水平的发展”发表评论。 101:1080-1092(2009)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to a Letter to the Editor concerning the paper entitled "Soybean Aphid Population Dynamics, Soybean Yield Loss, and Development of Stage-Specific Economic Injury Levels" published in the September-October 2009issue Agronomy Journal. First, we would like to quote a paragraph from our own paper (Catangui et al., 2009):Future field research is needed to confirm the applicability of the above recommendations for the diverse soybean growing conditions of the United States and the various interactions among soybean cultivars, soybean market value, soybean aphid control cost and efficacy, soil fertility and moisture, yield potential of the field, and other variables unforeseen by the authors of this current study. Thus, we were aware from the beginning that our paper was just but one contribution to the understanding of the soybean aphid as a pest of soybean. We welcome criticisms, positive comments, collaborations, and future refinements to the models and recommendations advanced to the scientific community by our paper. The Letter to the Editor authors should have no reason to find our paper "disconcerting" because we did not include certain publications; we would have, if the main topic of our paper was about soybean aphid natural enemies. Although the concepts advanced in our paper may be useful for studying soybean aphid natural enemies, the title of our paper clearly states that soybean aphid natural enemies was not the subject matter.
机译:感谢您有机会回应给编辑的信,该信涉及发表在2009年9月至10月期《农艺学杂志》上的题为“大豆蚜虫种群动态,大豆产量损失和特定阶段的经济伤害水平的发展”。首先,我们想引用我们自己论文中的一段内容(Catangui等人,2009):需要进行未来的田间研究,以确认上述建议对美国多种大豆种植条件的适用性以及各州之间的各种相互作用。大豆品种,大豆市场价值,大豆蚜虫控制成本和功效,土壤肥力和水分,田间单产潜力以及本研究作者未曾预料到的其他变量。因此,我们从一开始就意识到我们的论文只是对理解大豆蚜虫为大豆害虫的一种贡献。我们欢迎对我们的论文对科学界提出的模型和建议提出批评,正面评论,合作以及将来的改进。致编辑的信作者应该没有理由认为我们的论文“令人不安”,因为我们没有包括某些出版物。如果我们的论文的主要主题是关于大豆蚜虫的天敌,那我们将有。尽管本文提出的概念可能对研究大豆蚜虫天敌有用,但本文的标题明确指出,大豆蚜虫天敌不是主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号