首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular engineering and technology >Quantifying Diastolic Function: From E-Waves as Triangles to Physiologic Contours via the 'Geometric Method'
【24h】

Quantifying Diastolic Function: From E-Waves as Triangles to Physiologic Contours via the 'Geometric Method'

机译:量化舒张功能:通过“几何法”从电子波作为生理轮廓的三角形

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conventional echocardiographic diastolic function (DF) assessment approximates transmitral flow velocity contours (Doppler E-waves) as triangles, with peak (E-peak), acceleration time (AT), and deceleration time (DT) as indexes. These metrics have limited value because they are unable to characterize the underlying physiology. The parametrized diastolic filling (PDF) formalism provides a physiologic, kinematic mechanism based characterization of DF by extracting chamber stiffness (k), relaxation (c), and load (x(o) ) from E-wave contours. We derive the mathematical relationship between the PDF parameters and E-peak, AT, DT and thereby introduce the geometric method (GM) that computes the PDF parameters using E-peak, AT, and DT as input. Numerical experiments validated GM by analysis of 208 E-waves from 31 datasets spanning the full range of clinical diastolic function. GM yielded indistinguishable average parameter values per subject vs. the gold-standard PDF method (k: R-2 = 0.94, c: R-2 = 0.95, x(o) : R (2) = 0.95, p 0.01 all parameters). Additionally, inter-rater reliability for GM-determined parameters was excellent (k: ICC = 0.956 c: ICC = 0.944, x(o) : ICC = 0.993). Results indicate that E-wave symmetry (AT/DT) may comprise a new index of DF. By employing indexes (E-peak, AT, DT) that are already in standard clinical use the GM capitalizes on the power of the PDF method to quantify DF in terms of physiologic chamber properties.
机译:传统的超声心动图舒张功能(DF)评估以峰值(E峰值)、加速时间(AT)和减速时间(DT)为指标,将经皮血流速度轮廓(多普勒E波)近似为三角形。这些指标的价值有限,因为它们无法描述潜在的生理学特征。参数化舒张充盈(PDF)形式主义通过从E波轮廓中提取心室刚度(k)、松弛度(c)和负荷(x(o))来提供基于生理学、运动学机制的DF表征。我们推导了PDF参数与E峰值、AT、DT之间的数学关系,并由此引入几何方法(GM),该方法使用E峰值、AT和DT作为输入来计算PDF参数。数值实验通过分析来自31个数据集的208个E波来验证GM,这些数据集涵盖了整个临床舒张功能范围。与金标准PDF方法相比,GM得出的每个受试者的平均参数值难以区分(k:R-2=0.94,c:R-2=0.95,x(o):R(2)=0.95,p;0.01所有参数)。此外,GM确定参数的评分员间信度非常好(k:ICC=0.956 c:ICC=0.944,x(o):ICC=0.993)。结果表明,E波对称性(AT/DT)可能是DF的一个新指标。通过使用已经在标准临床使用的指标(E-peak、AT、DT),GM利用PDF方法的力量,根据生理室属性量化DF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号