首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular therapeutics >Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:经皮冠状动脉介入与偏冠状动脉旁路接枝左主冠状动脉疾病吗? 随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundIt is not clear whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is as effective and safe as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PCI and CABG in left main coronary disease.
机译:背景对于左主干冠状动脉疾病,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是否与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)一样有效和安全尚不清楚。我们的目的是对所有比较左主干冠状动脉疾病PCI和CABG的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号