首页> 外文期刊>British journal of psychotherapy >'JANET VS FREUD' ON TRAUMATIZATION: A CRITIQUE OF THE THEORY OF STRUCTURAL DISSOCIATION FROM AN OBJECT RELATIONS PERSPECTIVE
【24h】

'JANET VS FREUD' ON TRAUMATIZATION: A CRITIQUE OF THE THEORY OF STRUCTURAL DISSOCIATION FROM AN OBJECT RELATIONS PERSPECTIVE

机译:创伤化“珍妮特与弗洛伊德”:对象关系视角下的结构解离理论的批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In '"Janet vs Freud" on traumatization: A critique of the theory of structural dissociation from an object relations perspective' [BJP 32(4) (2016) 436-55], Joan Lesley and Sverre Varvin express concern that the theory of structural dissociation of the personality has taken hold in Norway, and has caused undue and unnecessary confusion regarding treatment of clients with dissociative disorders. According to the authors there is no need to change treatment models for subjects with dissociative disorders who might well be treated with psychoanalytic methods.
机译:在“珍妮特与弗洛伊德”创伤中:来自物体关系的结构解剖理论的批评'[BJP 32(4)(2016)436-55],Joan Lesley和Sverre Varvin表示关切的是结构理论 人格的解散在挪威举行了持有,并造成了对分离障碍的客户治疗的不必要和不必要的困惑。 根据作者的说法,无需改变有可能用精神分析方法治疗的分离障碍的受试者的治疗模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号