...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Haematology >High risk of relapse with intermediate dose cytarabine for consolidation in young favourable-risk acute myeloid leukaemia patients following induction with 7+3: a retrospective multicentre analysis and critical review of the literature
【24h】

High risk of relapse with intermediate dose cytarabine for consolidation in young favourable-risk acute myeloid leukaemia patients following induction with 7+3: a retrospective multicentre analysis and critical review of the literature

机译:中间剂量细胞酸的高风险与中间剂量含有急性髓白血病患者在诱导7 + 3以下的急性骨髓性白血病患者中的固结:回顾性多期面分析和对文献的关键综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Following the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines, we changed our practice from using high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC-3 g/m(2) q12h-D1,3,5) to intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC-1 center dot 5 g/m(2) q12h-D1,3,5/D1-3) for consolidation in young(<60 years) favourable-risk acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients. We assessed the clinical impact of this practice change. Of 80 patients, 51 received HIDAC prior to the protocol change, and subsequently, 29 received IDAC. The three-year risk of relapse was significantly higher with IDAC [61%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 40-82] compared with HIDAC (22%; 10-34), P < 0 center dot 01. Our findings suggest HIDAC, rather than IDAC, is the preferred dose for single-agent cytarabine consolidation in young, favourable-risk AML following 7+3 induction.
机译:在2017年欧洲莱克中世纪(ELN)指导方针之后,我们将我们的做法改为使用高剂量的细胞甘油(HIDAC-3G / M(2)Q12H-D1,3,5)到中期剂量的溶细胞素(IDAC-1中心点5 G / M(2)Q12H-D1,3,5 / D1-3)用于杨(<60岁)的合并良好风险急性髓性白血病(AML)患者。 我们评估了这种做法变化的临床影响。 在80例患者中,51例在议定书变更之前收到了HIDAC,随后,29名收到IDAC。 idac的三年复发风险明显高度升高[61%; 与HIDAC(22%; 10-34)相比,95%置信区间(CI)40-82,P <0中心点01.我们的研究结果表明HIDAC,而不是IDAC,是单粒细胞氨基滨固结的优选剂量 年轻,有利的风险AML遵循7 + 3诱导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号