首页> 外文期刊>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society >Cryptic species and taxonomic troubles: a rebuttal of the systematic treatment of the Asian ladies' tresses orchids (Spiranthes species; Orchidaceae) by Pace et al. (2019)
【24h】

Cryptic species and taxonomic troubles: a rebuttal of the systematic treatment of the Asian ladies' tresses orchids (Spiranthes species; Orchidaceae) by Pace et al. (2019)

机译:神秘的物种和分类学困难:通过Pace等人的亚洲女士束兰花(Spiranthes Gepiese)的系统治疗的反驳。 (2019)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In a recent research article by Pace et al. (2019), the authors claimed to have used information from phenology, morphology and molecular phylogenetics in their nomenclatural review of the Spiranthes sinensis complex. However, there are several scientific and botanical nomenclature issues with the Pace et al. (2019) paper in addition to its many errors and misinformation, which can be severely misleading and have the potential to affect our understanding of the highly complex Asian Spiranthes group. Here, we compare and critique their study in light of our study published prior to the article in the Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. We suggest that the authors should have resorted to improved and new molecular data and a truly integrative analysis to support: (1) re-circumscription of the S. sinensis species complex for each of the six species they recognized, and the treatment of S. hongkongensis as a hybrid; and (2) all the new synonymies they proposed for Asian Spiranthes.
机译:在最近的一篇关于PACE等人的研究文章中。 (2019年),作者声称在他们的螺旋式中复合物的命名综述中使用来自酚类学,形态和分子系统发育的信息。 然而,PACE等人有几个科学和植物的命名问题。 (2019)除了其许多错误和错误信息外,这可能会严重误导,并有可能影响我们对高度复杂的亚洲螺旋图组的理解。 在这里,我们根据我们在林南社会植物学杂志上发表的研究,比较和批判他们的研究。 我们建议作者应该采取改善和新的分子数据和真正的综合分析,以支持:(1)对他们认识到的六种物种中的每种物种中的每种综合复合物的重新界定,以及S.的治疗。 香港为杂交; (2)他们为亚洲螺旋的所有新同义词。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号