首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Electrical Engineering: Transactions of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Series E >FMEA SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT OF RAILWAY SIGNAL SYSTEM BASED ON EVIDENCE THEORY AND GREY RELATIONAL ANALYSIS
【24h】

FMEA SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT OF RAILWAY SIGNAL SYSTEM BASED ON EVIDENCE THEORY AND GREY RELATIONAL ANALYSIS

机译:基于证据理论和灰色关系分析的铁路信号系统FMEA安全风险评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In view of the characteristics of the differences among the different experts in the security risk assessment of the railway signal system, and the inaccuracy of the traditional Failure Mode and Effect Analysis assessment by calculating Risk Priority Number, the new assessment method based on evidence theory and grey relational analysis is proposed. Firstly, the result of each rating is evaluated by each expert. Evidence theory is applied to identify conflict evidence. Then, the final weight of the evidence is determined by the fusion of its consistency weight, decentralized weight, and the expert's own weight. The original evidence is corrected by the final weight, thus solving the characteristics of the differences among the different experts. Finally, each expert evaluates the failure modes of the railway signal system, when the evaluation result is corrected again, the grey relational analysis is used to calculate the relational degree. Therefore, the final assessment result can be obtained according to its priority ranking. Compared with the traditional Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, the evaluated result by this means is more accurate. The interface module between the Train Control Center and the Centralized Traffic Control has been taken as an example to verify its credibility and accuracy.
机译:鉴于在铁路信号系统的安全风险评估中不同专家的差异的特点,以及传统故障模式的不准确性和通过计算风险优先次数,基于证据理论的新评估方法和效果分析评估提出了灰色关系分析。首先,每个评级的结果由每个专家评估。证据理论适用于识别冲突证据。然后,证据的最终重量由其一致性重量,分散的重量和专家自身重量的融合来决定。原始证据通过最终重量来纠正,从而解决不同专家之间差异的特征。最后,每个专家评估铁路信号系统的故障模式,当再次纠正评估结果时,灰色关系分析用于计算关系程度。因此,最终评估结果可以根据其优先级排名获得。与传统的故障模式和效果分析相比,通过这种方式的评估结果更准确。已经采取了列车控制中心和集中式流量控制之间的接口模块,以验证其可信度和准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号