首页> 外文期刊>Aquaculture >The implications of aquaculture policy and regulation for the development of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in Europe
【24h】

The implications of aquaculture policy and regulation for the development of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in Europe

机译:水产养殖政策与法规对欧洲综合多途经营养水产养殖发展的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Demands for fish and shellfish as food products are increasing; however, the potential for large scale production faces numerous challenges. Policy and legislation are likely to have an impact on the development of more sustainable aquaculture practices such as integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA). This study investigated the flexibility within the current governance frameworks across six European countries to allow for the adoption and management of IMTA. A snowball approach was used to identify relevant EU legislation, which was used as the basis by which to identify national/regional legislation which implemented EU requirements. This data was combined with a desk study to create a legislation overview for each of six countries, which was then subject to a Comparative Legal Analysis of the regulatory frameworks. Key findings were that inter alia: an existing policy focus on environmental sustainability and technological innovation may be an incentive for IMTA; and that the regulatory framework is complex and extensive and this may be a barrier to IMTA. Overall, this study found that national frameworks were generally amenable to experimental IMTA pilot schemes, but that for commercial expansion substantial regulatory reform would be required. Particularly, there may be a need for change to some aspects of legal regimes relating to the transfer of disease, fish health and food safety. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:当食品增加时,对鱼类和贝类的需求增加;然而,大规模生产的潜力面临着许多挑战。政策和立法可能会对更可持续的水产养殖实践产生影响,例如综合多途径水产养殖(IMTA)。本研究调查了六个欧洲国家的现行治理框架内的灵活性,以允许通过和管理IMTA。雪球方法被用来识别相关欧盟立法,这些立法被用来识别实施欧盟要求的国家/地区立法的基础。该数据与书桌研究相结合,以为六个国家中的每一个创建立法概况,然后遵守监管框架的比较法律程度分析。主要发现尤其是:现有政策对环境可持续性和技术创新的关注可能是IMTA的激励措施;该监管框架复杂,广泛,这可能是IMTA的障碍。总体而言,本研究发现,国家框架通常适用于实验性IMTA试点计划,但对于商业扩张实质性监管改革,是必需的。特别是,可能需要改变与疾病转移,鱼类健康和食品安全有关的法律制度的某些方面。 (c)2015 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号