...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Impact pathway evaluation of an integrated Striga hermonthica control project in northern Nigeria.
【24h】

Impact pathway evaluation of an integrated Striga hermonthica control project in northern Nigeria.

机译:尼日利亚北部Striga hermonthica综合防治项目的影响途径评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper evaluates a project that developed and introduced integrated Striga control (ISC) in Northern Nigeria. Adoption of ISC increased from 44 participating farmers in four pilot areas to more than 500 farmers in 16 villages and hamlets in three seasons. On average, farmers adopted 3.25 different Striga control options from a basket of six "best bets". Resource-poor and -medium farmers were more likely to adopt than resource-rich ones. Adopting farmers enjoyed livelihood improvements, largely through selling ISC soyabean. Women in most adopting households benefited through selling food products based on soyabean. Adoption of ISC can be attributed to four factors: (1) farmer-field-school-type training that explained how the technologies worked; (2) incorporation of at least one technology in the ISC package that gave quick benefits to sustain farmer interest in adopting and learning other components whose effects took longer to become evident; (3) allowance for farmer experimentation and adaptation to local conditions; and, (4) use of a monitoring and evaluation component that identified and incorporated farmer modifications to continually improve the ISC package. These principles are likely to be valid for research and extension approaches for similar integrated natural resource management (INRM). Impact pathway evaluation methodology used for the evaluation helped give the project a greater impact focus; helped design and reporting of the evaluation; and, by identifying early adoption pathways, has provided a firm basis for any future ex post impact assessment of ISC in Northern Nigeria.
机译:本文评估了在尼日利亚北部开发并引入集成式Striga控制(ISC)的项目。在三个季节内,ISC的采用从四个试点地区的44个参与农户增加到16个村庄和小村庄的500多个农户。平均而言,农民从一篮子6个“最佳投注”中采用了3.25种不同的Striga控制选项。资源贫乏和中等收入的农民比资源丰富的农民更容易采用。收养农民的生计得到改善,主要是通过出售ISC大豆获得的。在大多数收养家庭中,妇女通过出售大豆食品而受益。采用ISC可以归因于四个因素:(1)农民田间学校式培训,说明了技术的工作原理; (2)在ISC软件包中纳入至少一种技术,该技术可以迅速带来收益,从而保持农民对采用和学习其效果要花费更长时间才能显现的其他组件的兴趣; (3)给予农民试验和适应当地条件的补贴; (4)使用监视和评估组件来识别和合并农民的修改,以不断改进ISC软件包。这些原则可能对类似的综合自然资源管理(INRM)的研究和扩展方法有效。用于评估的影响途径评估方法有助于使项目更加关注影响;帮助设计和报告评估;并且,通过确定早期采用的途径,为尼日利亚北部ISC今后的任何事后影响评估提供了坚实的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号