...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Cattle are cash generating assets for mixed smallholder farms in the Eastern Amazon.
【24h】

Cattle are cash generating assets for mixed smallholder farms in the Eastern Amazon.

机译:牛是东部亚马逊混合小农农场的创收资产。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The presence of cattle in the Amazon region is controversial in terms of their ecological suitability and profitability compared with crops. Nevertheless, they are widely distributed in the study area in north-eastern Para and, contrary to the common image of cattle on large ranches, a high proportion of them are kept on smallholder farms. To explain their presence, cattle are assumed to have benefits beyond physical production, such as complementing resource use or representing capital. To test this hypothesis, the costs and benefits of the three main agricultural activities, cattle, cassava and black pepper production, in terms of land, labour and capital productivity, were recorded in 37 small farms over a period of 15 months. To provide a longer perspective, benefits and costs of these activities were calculated for their assumed lifetime, which in the case of cattle, assumed a stable herd, derived from a deterministic herd model. The resultant values for land, labour and capital productivity of cattle were much lower than the values derived from direct observations during the study period, and were not as high as those for cassava and black pepper. Furthermore, the analysis of resource use in the farms showed that cattle production was not usually integrated with cropping activities, did not improve the use of available labour, and competed for land. Therefore, there had to be a reason for keeping cattle beyond their physical productivity. It was deduced to be their functional quality. Cattle could be disposed of quickly and easily at any time, in order to acquire large sums of cash or the equivalent in kind. The liquidity derived from keeping living stock was not matched by other agricultural activities or by the financial market. Hence, cattle turned out to be the best instrument of finance for the smallholder. Farmers were not interested in the continuous development of their herds, or sustainable production practices, and favoured low input management. Consequently, development plans relying on long-term, continuous commitments to pasture and cattle management are inappropriate. Instead, research and extension work should focus on simple, flexible and low-cost improvements to cattle keeping on crop-livestock smallholder farms, until credit programmes are available that replace the financing function of cattle..
机译:与农作物相比,亚马逊地区牛的生态适应性和获利能力存在争议。尽管如此,它们仍广泛分布在帕拉东北部的研究区内,与大型牧场上的牛的普遍形象相反,它们中的很大一部分被保存在小农户的农场上。为了解释它们的存在,牛被认为具有超越物质生产的益处,例如补充资源使用或代表资本。为了检验这一假设,在15个月的时间里,在37个小型农场中记录了三种主要农业活动的成本和收益(就土地,劳动力和资本生产率而言),包括牛,木薯和黑胡椒。为了提供更长远的眼光,计算了这些活动在其假定寿命内的收益和成本,对于牛来说,假定动物为稳定牛群,这是从确定性牛群模型得出的。研究期间牛的土地,劳动力和资本生产率的最终结果值远低于直接观察得出的值,没有木薯和黑胡椒的结果高。此外,对农场资源利用的分析表明,牛的生产通常不与耕种活动结合在一起,没有改善现有劳动力的利用,并争夺土地。因此,必须有一个理由使牲畜的生产能力超出其水平。据推测是它们的功能质量。为了获得大量现金或同等价值的现金,可随时轻松处置牛。保持牲畜存量产生的流动性无法与其他农业活动或金融市场相提并论。因此,事实证明,牛是小农的最佳筹资手段。农民对畜群的持续发展或可持续的生产方式不感兴趣,因此偏爱低投入管理。因此,依靠长期,持续的牧场和牲畜管理承诺的发展计划是不合适的。相反,研究和推广工作应着重于简单,灵活和低成本地改善农作物-畜牧小农场的牲畜饲养,直到有信贷计划取代牲畜的融资功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号