...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural processes >A further application of the active time model to multiple concurrent variable-interval schedules.
【24h】

A further application of the active time model to multiple concurrent variable-interval schedules.

机译:活动时间模型在多个并发可变间隔计划中的进一步应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this experiment we show that the active time model (ATM) accurately predicts probe data from multiple concurrent VI VI schedules. Subjects were trained under a concurrent VI 30-s VI 60-s and a concurrent VI 60-s VI 120-s schedule. Two types of unreinforced probes were then conducted. The first paired the two VI 60-s stimuli. These stimuli, while equivalent in their associated absolute rates of reinforcement, differed in their relative rates of reinforcement. The second probe paired the VI 30-s stimulus with the relatively rich VI 60-s stimulus. In contrast with the first probe, these stimuli differed in their absolute rates of reinforcement, while being similar in their relative rates. During the first set of probes, birds preferred the VI 60-s stimulus trained with the VI 120-s schedule. During the second set of probes, birds were indifferent to the two stimuli. These results are less extreme than others reported in the literature. Nonetheless, we found that ATM accurately fit individual subject data in both sets of probes. In contrast a variant of scalar expectancy theory did not fit the data at either the individual or group level.
机译:在本实验中,我们显示了活动时间模型(ATM)可从多个并发VI VI计划准确预测探测数据。在并发VI 30-s VI 60-s和并发VI 60-s VI 120-s时间表下对受试者进行了培训。然后进行了两种类型的非增强探针。第一个配对了两个VI 60-s刺激。这些刺激虽然在其相关的绝对增强速率上是等效的,但在它们的相对增强速率上却有所不同。第二个探针将VI 30-s刺激与相对丰富的VI 60-s刺激配对。与第一个探针相反,这些刺激的绝对增强速率不同,而相对速率相似。在第一组探测中,鸟类更喜欢使用VI 120-s时间表训练的VI 60-s刺激。在第二组探测期间,鸟类对这两种刺激无动于衷。这些结果没有文献中报道的其他结果那么极端。尽管如此,我们发现ATM准确地将两组探针中的个体受试者数据拟合。相比之下,标量期望理论的一种变体既不适合个人水平也不适合团体水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号