...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >The accuracy of noninvasive and continuous total hemoglobin measurement by pulse CO-Oximetry in human subjects undergoing hemodilution.
【24h】

The accuracy of noninvasive and continuous total hemoglobin measurement by pulse CO-Oximetry in human subjects undergoing hemodilution.

机译:通过脉搏血氧饱和度法在接受血液稀释的人类受试者中进行非侵入性和连续性总血红蛋白测量的准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Total hemoglobin (tHb) is one the most frequently ordered laboratory measurements. Pulse CO-Oximetry (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA) is a multi-wavelength spectrophotometric method for noninvasive and continuous hemoglobin monitoring (SpHb). In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of SpHb compared with laboratory CO-Oximeter measurement of tHb from arterial blood samples in 20 healthy volunteer subjects undergoing hemodilution. METHODS: After enrollment, approximately 500 mL of blood was drawn from subjects through an arterial or venous catheter. Each subject then rapidly received crystalloid i.v. fluid to compensate for the decrease in intravascular volume and reduce the hemoglobin concentration. Subjects received a maximum of 30 mL/kg i.v. fluid. SpHb was continuously monitored and recorded, and serial arterial blood samples were taken during the procedure. SpHb accuracy was analyzed by pairing SpHb and tHb measurements after the arterial blood draw with the resulting tHb test result. Bias, precision, and the average root-mean-square error were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five tHb measurements were collected. The average decrease in tHb during the blood removal and hemodilution procedure was 2.4 +/- 0.8 g/dL (mean +/- SD). The average difference between 335 paired measurements of SpHb and tHb was -0.15 g/dL, 1 SD of the difference was 0.92 g/dL, and the average root-mean-square difference was 0.94 g/dL. The difference between SpHb and tHb was <2.0 g/dL for 97% of the measurements. The difference was <1.5 g/dL for 97% of the measurements when tHb was <10 g/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse CO-Oximetry-based SpHb measurement is accurate within 1.0 g/dL (1 SD) compared with laboratory CO-Oximeter tHb measurement in subjects undergoing hemodilution.
机译:背景:总血红蛋白(tHb)是最常订购的实验室测量指标之一。脉冲血氧饱和度测定法(Masimo Corp.,Irvine,CA)是一种用于非侵入性和连续性血红蛋白监测(SpHb)的多波长分光光度法。在这项研究中,我们评估了SpHb的准确性,并与20名接受血液稀释的健康志愿者的动脉血氧饱和度测定仪从动脉血样本中检测tHb进行了比较。方法:入组后,通过动脉或静脉导管从受试者中抽取约500 mL血液。然后每个受试者迅速接受静脉内晶体。补液以补偿血管内体积的减少并降低血红蛋白浓度。受试者静脉内最大剂量为30 mL / kg。体液。连续监测和记录SpHb,并在手术过程中采集一系列动脉血样本。通过将动脉血抽取后的SpHb和tHb测量值与所得的tHb测试结果进行配对来分析SpHb的准确性。计算偏差,精度和平均均方根误差。结果:收集了165个tHb测量值。在采血和血液稀释过程中,tHb的平均下降为2.4 +/- 0.8 g / dL(平均值+/- SD)。 S335b和tHb的335对测量值之间的平均差为-0.15 g / dL,1 SD的差为0.92 g / dL,平均均方差为0.94 g / dL。对于97%的测量值,SpHb和tHb之间的差异<2.0 g / dL。当tHb <10 g / dL时,测量值的97%的差异为<1.5 g / dL。结论:与进行血液稀释的受试者的实验室血氧饱和度测定仪tHb测量相比,基于脉搏血氧饱和度测定的SpHb测量准确度在1.0 g / dL(1 SD)以内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号