【24h】

Modern starches are not safer than old ones.

机译:现代淀粉并不比旧淀粉更安全。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The review by Boldt suggesting that hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/ 0.4 is safe requires comments. Evidence has emerged that HES 130/0.4 is as unsafe as HES 200/0.5 in respect to the entire range of starch-related adverse effects, including coagulation in cardiac surgery, kidney dysfunction, pruritus, and tissue storage with risk of organ failure. In cardiac surgical patients, HES 130/0.4 impaired clot formation and strength to a similar degree as HES 200/0.5, whereas albumin had no negative effects.2 Chronic application of radio-labeled HES 200/0.5 or 130/0.4 led to reduced overall storage of the latter in rats; however, both HES solutions accumulated in the kidney in similar amounts. Renal lesions persist for many years, but prospective data on HES 130/0.4 is derived mainly from short perioperative studies in low-risk patients and with low cumulative doses.
机译:Boldt的评论表明羟乙基淀粉(HES)130 / 0.4是安全的,需要对此进行评论。有证据表明,就淀粉相关的全部不良影响而言,HES 130 / 0.4与HES 200 / 0.5一样不安全,包括心脏手术中的凝血,肾功能不全,瘙痒和具有器官衰竭风险的组织储存。在心脏外科手术患者中,HES 130 / 0.4损害血凝块形成和强度的程度与HES 200 / 0.5相似,而白蛋白没有负面影响。2长期应用放射性标记的HES 200 / 0.5或130 / 0.4导致总体降低后者在大鼠中的储存;但是,两种HES溶液在肾脏中的积累量相似。肾脏病变持续了很多年,但是关于HES 130 / 0.4的前瞻性数据主要来自对低危患者和低累积剂量的短期围手术期研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号