首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Dermatology >Which treatments for fungal nail infections work better, those taken by mouth work or those applied to the nail?
【24h】

Which treatments for fungal nail infections work better, those taken by mouth work or those applied to the nail?

机译:哪种治疗真菌指甲感染的处理方式更好,口就是占用的那些或应用于钉子的人?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail and is more likely to occur in toenails. In Europe and North America, approximately 4.3% of people have this infection. The infection accounts for approximately 50% of all nail‐related disease. To treat toenail infection, oral (taken by mouth) and topical (applied to the skin) medications are available. Topical treatments have lower success rates than oral treatments, but oral treatments may produce side effects or affect how other medications work. Published studies of clinical trials do not directly compare oral and topical treatments. This study, from Canadian researchers, aimed to use a statistical analysis called network meta‐analysis in order to estimate how oral and topical treatments compare to each other in terms of mycological cure (eradicating the fungal infection) and in adverse events (side effects). The authors found 26 published studies to include in their analysis. The authors wanted to include device‐based treatments (e.g. laser) and combination treatments, but there were not enough randomised controlled trials on these treatments. The results showed that daily use of the oral treatments of terbinafine 250 mg and itraconazole 200 mg were significantly more likely to eradicate the fungal infection compared to topical treatments. Other oral treatments and regimens were similar to topical treatments in producing mycological cure and every treatment was better than controls. In terms of side effects, there was no difference between oral and topical medications, and this may be because reports of side effects with oral medications arose after these clinical studies were completed. This current review suggests that patients have safe oral and topical medication options for toenail fungal infection. This summary relates to the study: Monotherapy for toenail onychomycosis: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
机译:发明内容oneChomycosis是钉子的真菌感染,更有可能发生在脚趾甲中。在欧洲和北美,大约4.3%的人有这种感染。感染占所有与钉子相关疾病的约50%。为了治疗趾甲感染,可获得口服(口服)和局部(适用于皮肤)药物。局部治疗的成功率较低,而不是口服处理,但口腔治疗可能会产生副作用或影响其他药物的工作。发表对临床试验的研究不会直接比较口腔和局部治疗。来自加拿大研究人员的这项研究旨在使用称为网络元分析的统计分析,以估计口腔和局部处理如何在Mycological治疗(消除真菌感染)和不良事件(副作用)方面相互比较。作者发现26名已发布的研究可以在分析中包含。作者希望包括基于装置的治疗(例如激光)和组合治疗,但在这些治疗中没有足够的随机对照试验。结果表明,与局部治疗相比,每日使用三萘丁嘧啶和伊拉唑唑200mg 200mg的口服治疗方法明显更可能消除真菌感染。其他口腔治疗和方案类似于局部治疗,在制作宫内治疗中,每种治疗都会比对照更好。在副作用方面,口腔和局部药物之间没有差异,这可能是由于在这些临床研究完成后,由于口服药物的副作用报告。本前评论表明,患者对趾甲真菌感染有安全的口服和局部药物选择。本发明涉及该研究:趾甲甲癣的单疗法:系统审查和网络META分析

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号