Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike

Carrell Douglas T.; Rajpert-De Meyts Ewa

首页> 外文期刊>Andrology >Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike

【24h】

Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike

机译：有意义的同行评审是质量科学必不可少的部分，应该为作者和评审者都带来好处

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

团队文献服务 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Andrology 》 |2013年第4期| 共2页
作者
Carrell Douglas T.; Rajpert-De Meyts Ewa;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类泌尿科学（泌尿生殖系疾病） ;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike [J] . Carrell Douglas T., Rajpert-De Meyts Ewa Andrology . 2013 ,第4期

机译：有意义的同行评审是质量科学必不可少的部分，应该为作者和评审者都带来好处
2. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models [J] . Elizabeth C Moylan, Frank Dudbridge, Jigisha Patel, BMJ Open . 2015 ,第9期

机译：在开放式或单盲同行评审模式下运行的期刊中，由作者建议和非作者建议的审阅者对报告质量的回顾性分析
3. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors. [J] . Schroter S, Tite L, Hutchings A, JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association . 2006 ,第3期

机译：作者或编辑建议的同行评审之间，评审质量和发表建议的差异。
4. Reviewing the reviewers: A study of author perception on peer reviews in computer science [C] . Kuhne Conny, Bohm Klemens, Jing Zhi Yue Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing . 2010

机译：审阅审稿人：作者对计算机科学同行审稿的看法研究
5. Analysis of the Methodological Quality of Published Prosthodontic-related Systematic Reviews and their Impact on Clinical Practice, Research and Teaching According to the Correspondent Authors. [D] . Aziz, Tehnia. 2012

机译：据通讯作者分析，已发表的修复相关系统评价的方法学质量及其对临床实践，研究和教学的影响。
6. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models [O] . Maria K Kowalczuk, Frank Dudbridge, Shreeya Nanda, 2015

机译：在开放式或单盲同行评审模式下运行的期刊中由作者建议和非作者建议的审阅者对报告质量的回顾性分析
7. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike [O] . Douglas T. Carrell, Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts 2013

机译：有意义的同行评审是质量科学的一体化，应该为作者和审稿人提供福利

Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅