首页> 外文期刊>Animal Welfare >Do double cages and access to occupational materials improve the welfare of farmed mink?
【24h】

Do double cages and access to occupational materials improve the welfare of farmed mink?

机译:双笼和使用职业材料是否会改善养殖水貂的福利?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effects of cage enrichments and additional space were studied in 60 pairs of mink kits kept in standard cages (STD) and 67 pairs of mink kits kept in enriched cages (ENR). During the period from mid July to the end of September both groups had alternate access to one and two connected cages. From October, half of the mink in each group had permanent access to one cage and the other half permanent access to two cages. The enrichment of the cages consisted of extra resting places (tubes made of wire mesh and plastic) and occupational materials in terms of table-tennis balls and ropes to pull and chew. The mink were observed for an experimental period of nine months, from late lactation until the beginning of the following mating season. The welfare was assessed through behavioural traits (use of nest box and enrichments, activity out in the cage, stereotypies and fur-chewing) consumption of food and straw, bodyweight and level of faecal corticoid metabolites. The presence of enrichments resultedin less tail-chewing, fewer stereotypies, and a reduced level of faecal corticoid metabolites. In addition, the presence of enrichments led to fewer social interactions and reduced the consumption of straw. Regarding the frequency of utilising differentoccupational materials, the mink did not use the table-tennis balls, but the tubes and pull-ropes were given extensive use. Access to one or double cages had no effect on stereotypies, fur-chewing and physiology linked to welfare, but mink with access todouble cages used the nest box less, had a lower consumption of straw and pull-ropes than the mink with access to only one cage. However, there were no indications of frustration when the mink were deprived of using double cages. We conclude that increased environmental complexity in the form of occupational materials improved the welfare of the mink, whereas doubling the cage size had little or no effect in relation to mink welfare.
机译:通过在标准笼子(STD)中保存的60对貂皮套件和在浓缩笼子(ENR)中保存的67对貂皮套件中研究了笼子浓缩和额外空间的影响。从7月中旬到9月底,这两个团体都可以交替进入一个和两个相连的网箱。从十月开始,每组中的一半貂皮可以永久进入一个网箱,另一半则可以永久进入两个网箱。笼子的增加包括额外的休息场所(由金属丝网和塑料制成的管子)和职业材料,如乒乓球和拉扯和咀嚼的绳索。从哺乳后期到下一个交配季节开始,水貂的实验期为9个月。通过行为特征(使用巢箱和浓缩物,在笼子里活动,刻板印象和咀嚼皮毛),食物和稻草的消耗,体重和粪便皮质类固醇代谢物的含量来评估福利。富集的存在导致较少的尾巴咀嚼,较少的定型观念和减少的粪便皮质类固醇代谢物水平。此外,浓缩的存在导致较少的社会互动并减少了秸秆的消耗。关于利用不同职业材料的频率,水貂没有使用乒乓球,但是管子和拉绳被广泛使用。使用一个或两个笼子对定型,咀嚼和与福利有关的生理没有影响,但是可以使用双笼子的貂使用的巢箱较少,比仅使用一个笼子的貂的秸秆和拉绳消耗少一笼。但是,当剥夺使用双笼的水貂时,没有任何沮丧的迹象。我们得出结论,以职业材料的形式增加环境的复杂性可以改善水貂的福利,而将笼子尺寸加倍对水貂的福利影响很小或没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号