...
首页> 外文期刊>Bioresource Technology: Biomass, Bioenergy, Biowastes, Conversion Technologies, Biotransformations, Production Technologies >Comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of biogas production from marine algae and cattle manure biorefineries
【24h】

Comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of biogas production from marine algae and cattle manure biorefineries

机译:来自海藻和牛粪生物料理生物原沼气生产的比较摇篮 - 严重生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The environmental impacts resulting from the cradle-to-grave life cycles of Enteromorpha prolifera macroalgae and cattle manure biorefineries are assessed and compared. Sensitivity analysis is carried out to evaluate the response of the impacts to changes in biogas application by using Simapro 7.3.3. Three scenarios are considered in the biorefineries. In the first and second scenarios, the biogas produced is considered to be used for electricity production and transportation, respectively. In the third scenario, the biogas is considered to be recycled back to the systems. Process energy requirements and transportation of inputs contribute the largest share of the overall impacts. The cattle manure biorefinery is slightly more eco-friendly than the macroalgae biorefinery in Scenarios 1 and 2 because it requires more eco-friendly inputs. However, the macroalgae biorefinery becomes more eco-friendly than the cattle manure biorefinery in Scenario 3 because macroalgae require less energy and water for biogas production. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:评估和比较由肠球肺脯氨酸大甲状腺凝聚物和牛粪生物猎犬的摇篮到严重生命周期产生的环境影响。进行敏感性分析,以评估使用SimaPro 7.3.3评估对沼气应用变化的影响。在生物猎物中考虑了三种情况。在第一和第二场景中,产生的沼气被认为分别用于电力生产和运输。在第三种情况下,将沼气被认为回收回系统。流程能源需求和投入运输有助于整体影响的最大份额。牛粪生物遗料略微友好地比Macroalgae Biorefinery在情景1和2中,因为它需要更加环保的投入。然而,MAROALGAE BIOREFINERY比情景3中的牛粪生物术更加环保,因为MAROALGAE需要较少的能量和水进行沼气生产。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号