首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Infection Control >Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of split-septum and single-use prefilled flushing device vs 3-way stopcock on central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in India: a randomized clinical trial conducted by the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)
【24h】

Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of split-septum and single-use prefilled flushing device vs 3-way stopcock on central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in India: a randomized clinical trial conducted by the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)

机译:分隔隔膜和一次性使用的冲水装置与三通旋塞阀相比,三通旋塞阀对印度与中心线相关的血液感染率的临床影响和成本效益:国际医院感染控制协会(INICC)进行的一项随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Three-way stopcocks (3WSCs) are open systems used on intravenous tubing. Split septums (SSs) are closed systems with prepierced septums. Single-use prefilled flushing devices (SUFs) carry a lower risk of contamination than standard intravenous flushing. 3WSC and standard flushing are widely used in developing countries. This is the first randomized clinical trial (RCT) to compare rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) between patients using an SS + SUF and those using a 3WSC.
机译:背景:三通旋塞阀(3WSC)是用于静脉输液管的开放式系统。分离式隔片(SS)是带有预先插入式隔片的封闭系统。与标准的静脉冲洗相比,一次性使用的预填充冲洗设备(SUF)污染的风险更低。 3WSC和标准冲洗在发展中国家广泛使用。这是第一个比较使用SS + SUF的患者和使用3WSC​​的患者之间的中心线相关血流感染(CLABSI)发生率的随机临床试验(RCT)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号