...
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Construct validity of a novel assessment tool for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block
【24h】

Construct validity of a novel assessment tool for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block

机译:超声引导腋下臂丛神经阻滞新型评估工具的有效性构建

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity and reliability of a novel metrics-based assessment tool, previously developed for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Five expert and eight novice anaesthetists performed a total of 18 ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks on the same number of patients. A trained investigator video-taped procedures according to a pre-defined protocol. Two trained consultant anaesthetists independently scored the videos using the assessment tool. Compared with novices, experts completed more steps (mean 41.0 vs. 33.1, p = 0.001), had fewer procedural errors (2.8 vs. 7.9, p < 0.0001), had fewer critical errors (0.8 vs. 1.3, p = 0.030), and fewer total errors (3.5 vs. 9.1, p < 0.0001). The mean inter-rater reliability for scoring of experts' performance was 0.91, for novices' performance was 0.84, and for all performance combined (n = 18) was 0.88. This assessment tool is valid, and discriminates reliably between expert and novice performance for placement of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks.
机译:这项研究的目的是检查以前为超声引导的腋下臂丛神经阻滞开发的新型基于度量的评估工具的构造有效性和可靠性。五名专家和八名新手麻醉师对相同数量的患者进行了总共18个超声引导的腋下臂丛神经阻滞。经过培训的研究人员根据预先定义的协议对视频进行了录音。两名训练有素的顾问麻醉师使用评估工具对视频进行了独立评分。与新手相比,专家完成的步骤更多(平均41.0 vs. 33.1,p = 0.001),程序错误更少(2.8 vs. 7.9,p <0.0001),关键错误更少(0.8 vs. 1.3,p = 0.030),和更少的总错误(3.5比9.1,p <0.0001)。专家绩效得分的平均评定者可靠性为0.91,新手绩效为0.84,所有综合水平(n = 18)为0.88。该评估工具是有效的,并且可以在超声引导腋下臂丛神经阻滞的位置可靠地区分专家和新手性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号