...
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Risk of pulmonary aspiration with laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube during positive pressure ventilation.
【24h】

Risk of pulmonary aspiration with laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube during positive pressure ventilation.

机译:正压通气期间,使用喉罩气管和气管导管进行肺误吸的风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It was with great interest that I read Bernardini and Natalini's [1] study comparing the risk of aspiration during positive pressure ventilation via laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) and tracheal tubes. The authors rightly pointed out that fortunately this is an infrequent event and as such would require an enormous number of patients to be entered into a randomised controlled trial for meaningful conclusions to be drawn. They reported their institute's observational data over a 10.5-year period, and concluded that their study increased the level of current evidence and that the risk of pulmonary aspiration in selected patients did not increase when a LMA was used instead of a tracheal tube.
机译:我很感兴趣地阅读了Bernardini和Natalini的研究[1],该研究比较了通过喉罩气道(LMA)和气管导管进行正压通气期间的抽吸风险。作者正确地指出,幸运的是,这种情况很少发生,因此需要大量患者参加随机对照试验才能得出有意义的结论。他们报告了其研究所在10.5年内的观察数据,得出的结论是,他们的研究增加了现有证据的水平,并且使用LMA代替气管导管时,某些患者发生肺部吸入的风险并未增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号