...
首页> 外文期刊>Birth >Satisfaction with a Modified Form of In-Hospital Birth Center Care Compared with Standard Maternity Care
【24h】

Satisfaction with a Modified Form of In-Hospital Birth Center Care Compared with Standard Maternity Care

机译:与标准的孕产妇护理相比,改良型住院分娩中心护理的满意度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: For safety reasons an in-hospital birth center was replaced by a modified form of birth center care with the same medical guidelines and equipment as in standard care. The aim of this study was to investigate women's and men's satisfaction with modified care compared with standard care. Methods: Women in both groups gave birth from July 2007 to July 2008. The same medical low-risk criteria during pregnancy applied to both groups. Of those invited to the study, 547 (82.7%) women in modified birth center care and 445 (66.7%) men returned a questionnaire posted 2 months after the birth, and 786 (71.6%) women and 639 (58.2%) men in standard care. Odds ratios (ORs) for being satisfied were calculated with 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs) and adjusted for possible confounders. We also explored the effects of different components of care on overall satisfaction. Results: Adjusted ORs for being satisfied overall were approximately doubled in the modified birth center group compared with the standard care group: antenatal care-OR: 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.7) in women and OR: 2.2 (95% CI: 1.5-2.8) in men; intrapartum care-OR: 2.2 (95% CI: 1.7-2.9) in women and OR: 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3-2.4) in men; and postpartum care-OR: 1.7 in women (95% CI: 1.4-2.2) and OR: 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.8) in men. Important explanations of these differences included perception of the midwife as being more supportive, the presence of a calmer environment and atmosphere (intrapartum), and the option for fathers to stay overnight (postpartum). Conclusion: In-hospital birth center with medical equipment on site increased overall satisfaction with all episodes of care compared with standard care.
机译:背景:出于安全原因,医院内的出生中心被改型的出生中心护理所取代,其医疗指南和设备与标准护理相同。这项研究的目的是调查与标准护理相比,男女对改良护理的满意度。方法:两组妇女均于2007年7月至2008年7月分娩。两组在怀孕期间的医疗低危标准相同。在被邀请参加这项研究的那些人中,有547(82.7%)名接受分娩中心护理的妇女和445名(66.7%)的男子在分娩后2个月返回了一份问卷,其中786名(71.6%)的妇女和639名(58.2%)标准护理。使用95%的置信区间(CI)计算满足的赔率(OR),并针对可能的混杂因素进行调整。我们还探讨了护理的不同组成部分对整体满意度的影响。结果:改良后的出生中心组与标准护理组相比,调整后的总体满意程度大约增加了一倍:产前护理-OR:女性为2.1(95%CI:1.6-2.7),OR:2.2(95%CI: 1.5-2.8);产时护理-OR:女性为2.2(95%CI:1.7-2.9),OR:男性为1.7(95%CI:1.3-2.4);产后护理OR:女性为1.7(95%CI:1.4-2.2),男性为2​​.1(95%CI:1.6-2.8)。对这些差异的重要解释包括:对助产士的支持感有所提高,环境和氛围更加平静(产时)以及父亲可以选择过夜(产后)。结论:与标准护理相比,在医院内分娩中心配备医疗设备可以提高所有护理的总体满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号