...
首页> 外文期刊>Birth >Web-based News Reports on Midwives Compared with Obstetricians: A Prospective Analysis
【24h】

Web-based News Reports on Midwives Compared with Obstetricians: A Prospective Analysis

机译:基于网络的助产士与产科医生的新闻报道:前瞻性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: The media both creates and reflects public opinion. The way in which health professionals are depicted in the media is likely to influence views held by and about different health professions. The aim of this study was to examine how midwives and obstetricians are reported in English language web-based news reports from around the world. Methods: News alerts from the Internet search engine Google were created to search for the terms "midwife,""midwives,""midwifery,""obstetrics," and "obstetricians." These alerts were received over a 12-month period (May 1, 2006-April 31, 2007), downloaded, and analyzed using quantitative content analysis. Results: A total of 522 web-based news reports for midwifery and 564 for obstetrics (n=1,086) were found. Dominant categories for midwives were: "mainstreaming midwives" (models of care/rise of midwifery) (28%); "the Cinderella of the maternity care" (workforce/industrial) (27%); "delivering the baby with your hands tied" (funding, insurance, and legislation) (21%); "ask the expert" (education, research, and health advice) (8%), "recognizing midwives" (awards and announcements) (7%), "unsafe midwives" (litigation) (6%); and "the art of birth" (books, film, and photographs) (2%). Dominant categories for obstetricians were: "ask the expert" (research and advice) (26%); "doctors are heroes amongst us" (awards and announcements) (19%); "obstetric workforce woes" (workforce/industrial) (19%); "new frontiers" (trends in care and new technology) (17%); "the disappearing obstetrician" (insurance and litigation) (10%); and "human-interest news reports" (9%). Obstetricians were more likely to be recognized as experts on pregnancy and birth and receive public recognition compared with midwives. Midwives were more likely to be depicted as struggling to be a mainstream option while being hampered by lack of funding, insurance, and legislative barriers. Conclusions: Although midwives have rising acceptance, they still struggle with recognition. Obstetricians have both acceptance and recognition. Countries where midwifery is a mainstream option have more news reports related to midwifery than obstetrics. Different issues appear more dominant in some countries, such as work force in the United Kingdom and funding, insurance, and legislation in the United States.
机译:背景:媒体既创造又反映了公众舆论。媒体对卫生专业人员的描述方式很可能会影响不同卫生专业人员之间的观点。这项研究的目的是研究世界各地基于英语的网络新闻报道中如​​何报道助产士和妇产科医生。方法:创建了来自Internet搜索引擎Google的新闻警报,以搜索术语“助产士”,“助产士”,“助产士”,“产科”和“产科医生”。这些警报在12个月内(2006年5月1日至2007年4月31日)收到,下载并使用定量内容分析进行了分析。结果:共找到522个基于网络的助产士新闻报道和564个关于产科的新闻报道(n = 1,086)。助产士的主要类别为:“主流助产士”(照料模式/助产士的上升)(28%); “产妇保健的灰姑娘”(劳动力/工业界)(27%); “双手绑住婴儿”(资金,保险和法规)(21%); “询问专家”(教育,研究和健康建议)(8%),“认可助产士”(奖励和公告)(7%),“不安全助产士”(诉讼)(6%);和“出生的艺术”(书籍,电影和照片)(占2%)。产科医生的主要类别是:“问专家”(研究和建议)(26%); “医生是我们中间的英雄”(奖项和公告)(19%); “产科劳动力困境”(劳动力/工业)(19%); “新领域”(护理和新技术趋势)(17%); “正在消失的产科医生”(保险和诉讼)(10%);和“以人为本的新闻报道”(9%)。与助产士相比,妇产科医生更有可能被公认为妊娠和分娩方面的专家,并得到公众的认可。助产士更可能被描述为努力成为主流选择,同时由于缺乏资金,保险和立法障碍而受到阻碍。结论:尽管助产士的接受度不断提高,但他们仍在努力获得认可。产科医生既有接受也有承认。以助产士为主流的国家,与产科有关的新闻报道更多。在某些国家中,不同的问题似乎更加占主导地位,例如英国的劳动力以及美国的资金,保险和立法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号