首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion
【24h】

Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion

机译:成人双上颌前突自锁托槽带微型植入物和头饰固定之间的治疗结果差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Our aim was to determine differences between the outcomes of treatment using microimplant anchorage compared with headgear anchorage in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion treated with self-ligating brackets. Methods: Thirty-one adult orthodontic patients (13 men, 18 women; age, 25.87 +/- 3.37 years) who were diagnosed with bimaxillary protrusion were selected. All patients were treated with self-ligating brackets and maximum anchorage after extraction of 4 first premolars. Group 1 received microimplant anchorage, and group 2 received headgear. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained before and after treatment. Differences in the skeletal and dental parameters between and within groups were analyzed. Results: No significant difference was observed in the mean treatment times between the groups (21.93 +/- 3.10 vs 23.88 +/- 2.68 months). There was no significant difference in skeletal measurements before or after treatment in patients who received microimplant anchorage. Patients who received headgear anchorage had an increase of the mandibular plane angle. The microimplant anchorage group had greater anterior tooth retraction and less maxillary molar mesialization than did the headgear group. Conclusions: In both the anteroposterior and vertical directions, microimplant anchorage achieved better control than did the traditional headgear appliance during the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion.
机译:简介:我们的目的是确定在使用自结扎支架治疗的双上颌前突成年患者中,微植入物锚固与头饰锚固相比治疗结果之间的差异。方法:选择被诊断为双上颌前突的成人正畸患者31例(男13例,女18例;年龄25.87 +/- 3.37岁)。拔除4个前磨牙后,所有患者均接受自结扎支架和最大锚固治疗。第一组接受微植入物锚固,第二组接受头带。治疗前后均获得侧位X线片。分析了各组之间以及组内骨骼和牙齿参数的差异。结果:两组之间的平均治疗时间未见显着差异(21.93 +/- 3.10 vs. 23.88 +/- 2.68个月)。在接受微植入物锚固的患者中,治疗前后的骨骼测量没有显着差异。接受头盔固定的患者下颌平面角增加。与头套组相比,微种植体锚固组的前牙缩回更大,上颌磨牙的齿化效果更差。结论:在前后方向和垂直方向上,微种植体的锚固在双上颌前突治疗中均比传统的头套矫治器获得更好的控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号