...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Enamel loss associated with orthodontic adhesive removal on teeth with white spot lesions: An in vitro study.
【24h】

Enamel loss associated with orthodontic adhesive removal on teeth with white spot lesions: An in vitro study.

机译:与白斑病变牙齿上的正畸粘合剂去除相关的牙釉质损失:一项体外研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Teeth with white spot lesions (WSL) might be more prone to enamel loss during bracket debonding. This in vitro study compared enamel loss from teeth with (n = 14) and without (n = 14) WSL after polishing with low-speed finishing burs or disks (Sof-Lex, 3M ESPE, St Paul, Minn). Debonded surfaces were analyzed with a contact stylus profilometer, and digitized data were compared with baseline readings by using AnSur NT software (Regents, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn). Specimen surfaces were also examined with a scanning electron microscope. Two-way analysis of variance was performed to analyze the data. In teeth without WSL, the volume losses were 0.16 mm(3) for the bur group and 0.10 mm(3) for the disk group; the mean maximum depths were 47.7 microm for the bur group and 54.3 microm for the disk group. In teeth with WSL, the volume losses were 0.06 and 0.17 mm(3), and the mean maximum depths were 35.1 and 48.7 microm for the bur and disk groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in enamel loss between the 2 groups of teeth without WSL (P =.12). However, in teeth with WSL, the burs removed less enamel than the disks (P = 0.006). Scanning electron microscope examination showed that any damage on the enamel surface was usually located in the cervical third of the teeth. On most specimens, even though tooth surfaces appeared resin-free to the naked eye, there were remnants of it. The differences between groups were so small that they might be clinically insignificant.
机译:具有白色斑点病变(WSL)的牙齿在托槽剥离时可能更容易掉釉。这项体外研究比较了用低速精加工毛刺或圆盘(Sof-Lex,3M ESPE,St Paul,Minn)抛光后,有(n = 14)和没有(n = 14)WSL的牙齿的牙釉质损失。用接触式测针轮廓仪分析脱粘的表面,并通过使用AnSur NT软件(Regents,明尼苏达州大学,明尼阿波利斯市,明尼苏达州)将数字化数据与基线读数进行比较。样品表面也用扫描电子显微镜检查。进行了方差的双向分析来分析数据。在没有WSL的牙齿中,bur组的体积损失为0.16 mm(3),而椎间盘组的体积损失为0.10 mm(3)。 bur组的平均最大深度为47.7微米,圆盘组的平均最大深度为54.3微米。 WSL牙的体积损失分别为0.06和0.17 mm(3),而车针和牙盘组的平均最大深度分别为35.1和48.7微米。没有WSL的两组牙齿之间的牙釉质损失没有显着差异(P = .12)。但是,在带有WSL的牙齿中,磨头去除的牙釉质比磨盘少(P = 0.006)。扫描电子显微镜检查表明,釉质表面的任何损伤通常位于子宫颈的三分之一处。在大多数样品上,即使牙齿表面肉眼看上去没有树脂,也有残留。两组之间的差异很小,以至于在临床上可能微不足道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号