...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Ophthalmology: The International Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of retinal thickness measurements between three-dimensional and radial scans on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
【24h】

Comparison of retinal thickness measurements between three-dimensional and radial scans on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

机译:在光谱域光学相干断层扫描上进行三维扫描和径向扫描的视网膜厚度测量结果的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare retinal thickness (RT) measurements between traditional 6 radial line scans and three-dimensional (3D) scans using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive case series. METHODS: Twenty eyes of 17 patients with macular diseases and 8 healthy subjects were scanned using 2 different methods (3D scan and 6 radial line scan) using 2 different SD-OCT devices (Topcon OCT-1000 [Topcon Inc, Paramus, New Jersey, USA] and Canon SPOCT [(Canon/Optopol Inc, Depew, New York, USA]) by an experienced OCT operator. In 16 eyes, the data of TD-OCT were also obtained for comparison. The RT in 9 regions based on Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study areas were analyzed and compared. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement. RESULTS: In the eyes with macular diseases, there was no significant difference in the RT between 3D and 6 radial line scans except the center subfield (P = .011) on the Topcon OCT-1000, and inner inferior (P = .031) and outer nasal (P = .014) areas on the Canon SPOCT. In the healthy subjects, there was no significant difference between the different scans on both SD-OCT devices. The 95% limit of subjects was 3.2 to 30.6 microm and 16.7 to 28.3 microm in the eye with macular diseases on OCT-1000 and SPOCT, respectively, and 6.7 to 13.6 microm and 10.8 to 32.3 microm in healthy subjects on OCT-1000 and SPOCT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest the RT obtained by the 2 different scan patterns, 3D scan and 6 radial line scan, did not differ significantly on SD-OCT.
机译:目的:使用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT),比较传统的6条径向线扫描和3D(3D)扫描的视网膜厚度(RT)测量结果。设计:前瞻性,连续案例系列。方法:使用2种不同的SD-OCT设备(Topcon OCT-1000 [Topcon Inc,Paramus,New Jersey,美国]和佳能SPOCT [(Canon / Optopol Inc,Depew,纽约,美国)),由经验丰富的OCT运营商提供。在16只眼中,还获得了TD-OCT数据进行比较。9个地区的RT基于早期对糖尿病视网膜病变的治疗区域进行了分析和比较,使用Bland-Altman图评估一致性。结果:在黄斑疾病的眼中,3D和6次field骨线扫描之间的RT差异无统计学意义,除了中心子区域(P在Topcon OCT-1000上为.011),在佳能SPOCT上为内下(P = .031)和鼻外(P = .014),在健康受试者中,两次扫描之间没有显着差异两种SD-OCT装置,受试者的95%限制为3.2至30.6微米和16.7吨o在OCT-1000和SPOCT上的黄斑疾病眼中分别为28.3微米和在OCT-1000和SPOCT上的健康受试者中分别为6.7至13.6微米和10.8至32.3微米。结论:初步结果表明,通过2种不同的扫描模式(3D扫描和6条radial线扫描)获得的RT在SD-OCT上无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号