首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Ophthalmology: The International Journal of Ophthalmology >Quantification of peripapillary total retinal volume in pseudopapilledema and mild papilledema using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
【24h】

Quantification of peripapillary total retinal volume in pseudopapilledema and mild papilledema using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

机译:使用光谱域光学相干断层扫描定量量化假性上睑及轻度乳头水肿的乳头周围总视网膜体积

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To distinguish differences in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and peripapillary total retinal volume between eyes with papilledema, pseudopapilledema, and normal findings. Design Cohort study. Methods Forty-two eyes with mild papilledema, 37 eyes with congenitally elevated optic disc (pseudopapilledema), and 34 normal eyes met the inclusion criteria at 1 academic institution (in Iran) and underwent neuro-ophthalmic examination. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans surrounding the optic disc were performed in each eye of patients and subjects. Main outcome measures were mean RNFL thickness and peripapillary total retinal volume measurements (inner and outer ring volumes) that were compared between groups, using the generalized estimating equation approach. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves were also calculated. Results A statistically significant difference was found in mean RNFL thickness between both groups of patients with papilledema and pseudopapilledema and normal subjects. Average inner peripapillary total retinal volume in the papilledema, pseudopapilledema, and control groups were 1.95 ± 0.24 mm3, 1.81 ± 0.23 mm3, and 1.06 ± 0.10 mm3, respectively. Average outer peripapillary total retinal volume in the papilledema and pseudopapilledema groups were 2.68 ± 0.49 mm3 and 2.03 ± 0.24 mm3, respectively (P .001). However, the outer ring peripapillary total retinal volume was not different between pseudopapilledema and normal (1.90 ± 0.11 mm 3) eyes (P =.17). Area under the curve to discriminate pseudopapilledema vs papilledema eyes for average RNFL thickness and inner and outer peripapillary total retinal volumes was 0.82, 0.68, and 0.88, respectively. Conclusion Outer peripapillary total retinal ring volumes might be useful in differentiating papilledema from pseudopapilledema.
机译:目的区分视神经乳头水肿,假性视乳头水肿和正常发现的眼睛的视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度和乳头周围总视网膜体积的差异。设计队列研究。方法42眼轻度视乳头水肿,37眼先天性视盘增高(假性睑缘水肿)和34眼正常眼符合1个学术机构(在伊朗)的纳入标准,并接受了神经眼科检查。在患者和受试者的每只眼睛中进行视盘周围的光谱域光学相干断层扫描。主要结局指标为平均RNFL厚度和乳头周围总视网膜体积测量值(内环和外环体积),使用广义估计方程法进行了比较。还计算了接收器工作特性曲线下的面积。结果两组患乳头状水肿和假性腮腺水肿的患者与正常人之间的平均RNFL厚度存在统计学差异。乳头状水肿,假性乳头状水肿和对照组的平均内周乳头总视网膜体积分别为1.95±0.24 mm3、1.81±0.23 mm3和1.06±0.10 mm3。视乳头水肿和假性视乳头水肿组的平均外周骨膜外视网膜总体积分别为2.68±0.49 mm3和2.03±0.24 mm3(P <.001)。然而,假性视乳头水肿和正常(1.90±0.11mm 3)眼之间,外圈乳突周围的视网膜总体积没有差异(P = .17)。区分平均RNFL厚度和内侧和外侧乳头周围总视网膜体积的假性上睑睑突水肿和乳头状肿胀眼的曲线下面积分别为0.82、0.68和0.88。结论外周乳头周围总视网膜环体积可能有助于区分乳头状水肿和假性乳头状水肿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号