...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Health expenditures for privately insured adults enrolled in managed care gatekeeping vs indemnity plans.
【24h】

Health expenditures for privately insured adults enrolled in managed care gatekeeping vs indemnity plans.

机译:参加有管理的医疗看护与赔偿计划的私人受保成人的医疗保健支出。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the ability of managed care gatekeeping strategies (i.e., requiring a designated primary care provider to authorize referrals) to control health care costs in the mid-1990s. METHODS: We analyzed expenditure data from 8195 privately insured adults sampled in the nationally representative 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Managed care gatekeeping plan enrollees included those in health maintenance organizations and other plans requiring a primary care gatekeeper. All others were considered indemnity plan enrollees. RESULTS: In 1996, total per capita annual health expenditures for adult gatekeeping enrollees were about Dollars 50 less than those of indemnity enrollees, primarily owing to lower out-of-pocket expenditures. After multivariate adjustment, mean per capita expenditures were approximately 6% lower for gatekeeping enrollees than for indemnity enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: In the private sector, gatekeeping strategies resulted in modest cost savings over indemnity plans.
机译:目的:我们评估了1990年代中期管理式护理看门策略(即要求指定的初级护理提供者授权转诊)控制医疗费用的能力。方法:我们分析了1996年全国有代表性的医疗支出小组调查中抽样的8195名私人参保成年人的支出数据。管理式护理看门计划的参与者包括健康维护组织的人员和其他需要初级护理看门者的计划。所有其他人均被视为赔偿计划的参与者。结果:1996年,成人看门人的人均年度医疗总支出比弥偿人少50美元,这主要是由于自付费用降低了。经过多变量调整后,看门人的人均支出比弥偿人的人均支出低约6%。结论:在私营部门中,关门策略导致比赔偿计划节省了适度的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号