首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Bringing public health back into public health policy debates
【24h】

Bringing public health back into public health policy debates

机译:将公共卫生带回公共卫生政策辩论中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The soap-opera style Harry and Louise ad campaign against Clinton Administration health reform broadcast during 1993-1994 was financed by the Health Insurance Association of America, an industry group concerned that health reform would reduce their revenues. In one episode, Louise informed a coworker that health reform would result in new taxes and loss of "the quality we like, the doctors we want, plans like ours." The combination of simple, clear messaging and absence of a Clinton Administration response contributed to health reform's demise. In one series of polls, public opposition nearly doubled. There was a shift in public sentiment from concern about the uninsured to self-interest predicated on the notion that gains by others necessitate losses for oneself: less choice, fewer services, higher cost, and more government control.
机译:在1993年至1994年间播放的针对希拉里·克林顿政府医疗改革的肥皂剧风格的哈利和路易士广告活动,是由美国医疗保险协会资助的,该组织关注医疗改革会减少其收入。在一个情节中,路易丝告诉同事,医疗改革将导致新的税收并失去“我们想要的质量,我们想要的医生,我们的计划”。简单,清晰的消息传递和克林顿政府对策的缺失共同导致了医疗改革的消亡。在一系列民意测验中,公众的反对声几乎翻了一番。公众情绪已经从对未保险的关注转向对个人利益的关注,这种观点认为,他人的获利必然会给自己带来损失:更少的选择,更少的服务,更高的成本以及更多的政府控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号